Sponsored-by: Orex Digital
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This new enhancement adds the ability to change the default order the subfields.
Both bibliographic and authority MARC subfield structure are taken into
account. And so the item edition as well (in the different screens when
item can be added/edited).
This will answer the following needs that have been listed in the
comments of the bug report:
- $i in 7xx fields should be the first subfield in the sequence
- 300 fields are sorted number first when cataloguers enter the letter fields first
- 100 field, it's commonly $a, $q, $d.
Test plan:
1. Edit a MARC frameworks, field 300
2. Resort the subfield (drag and drop the tab of the subfield) as you
like
3. Save
=> Notice that the list of fields are displayed following the order you
chose
4. Edit it again
=> The order is correctly kept!
5. Create a new bibliographic record
6. Notice that the subfields are order in the same sequence
7. Fill different subfields, not all
8. Save, edit again
9. Note that the subfields that have been filled are listed first, then
the empty ones. But the sequence defined at the framework level is kept.
10. Do the same for an authority framework and create/edit an authority
record
11. Modify item (952) subfields order
12. Create an item and confirm that the order is correct
13. Modify the ACQ framework, 952, modify the order of the subfield
14. Create a new order and confirm that the item form has the subfield
ordered following the sequence defined at the framework level
QA: Note that this patch is about bibliographic records only, next
patches deal with authotiries and items.
Sponsored-by: Orex Digital
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch simply sets the searchid to a blank string if not passed in
To test:
1 - Add a new biblio and save it
2 - Check the logs: /var/log/koha/kohadev/plack-intranet-error.log (or similar)
3 - Note warn about uninitialized value
4 - Apply patch
5 - Add a new biblio
6 - No warn
Signed-off-by: Phil Ringnalda <phil@chetcolibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We should remove all SQL queries that contain 0000-00-00 and finally
assume we do not longer have such value in our DB (for date type)
We already dealt with such values in previous update DB entries.
The 2 added by this one haven't been replaced already.
The code will now assume that either a valid date exist, or NULL/undef.
Test plan:
QA review is needed and test of the different places where code is
modified.
Not sure about the change from reports/issues_avg_stats.pl
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Sometimes additem.pl will complain about "Storable::thaw failed to
thaw LastCreatedItem-cookie.", see bug 14844. Now, actually fix the bug.
The bug is caused by trying to URI (un)escape MARC::Record, binary data.
We'll use a base64 url-safe version instead.
Test plan:
1: Set PrefillItem to 'The new item is prefilled...'
2: Set a SubfieldsToUseWhenPrefill, 'c' for example
3: Add a new item for biblio A with 'c' set.
4: Double check 'c' value is set for next new item A.
5: search and add a new item for biblio B
6: 'c' is not set
Apply patch
7: logout, login
8: repeat steps 3, 4, and 5 .
9: now 'c' is set.
Signed-off-by: Pasi Kallinen <pasi.kallinen@joensuu.fi>
Signed-off-by: James O'Keeffe <jamespfk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
JD amended patch: fix commit title and add test plan
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
add authority type in the form to create the missing authority.
when authority was found, the 600$9 field have the authid.
Testing scenario (Creating an authority record for a failed automatic link) :
1 - In your system preferences set:
AutoCreateAuthorities: Don't generate
BiblioAddsAuthorities: Allow
2 - Go to the Cataloging -> New record (koha/cataloguing/addbiblio.pl)
Ensure you are using the basic editor
3 - Click the "Link authorities automatically" button.
A message should appear, telling the user "No authority link was changed."
4 - Add random informations in field 600$a of the biblio record.
5 - Click the "Link authorities automatically" button.
the message box should now show "600 - No matching authority found.".
the 9 subfield is red
Above the 9 subfield is a red X with a blue plus next to it
Hover on the plus, see it is titled 'Create authority'
6 - Click the 'Create authority' link
7 - A new authroity form pops up, the info from the cataloging editor is prefilled
Click the 100 field heading to expand and confirm info is transferred
8 - Fill in necessary fields and save the new authority
9 - The cataloging screen now has the 9 subfield populated and is green
10 - Click "Link authorities automatically" again
Dialog says "No authority link was changed"
11 - In another tab go to System preferences and set AutoCreateAuthorities to 'Generate'
12 - Add random information to the 650 field
13 - Click 'Link authorities' button
14 - Dialog says:650 - No matching authority found. A new authority was created automatically.
15 - The subfield 9 is green and has the id of the new authority record
16 - In another tab search authorities and find an existing subject heading
17 - Add a new 650 with the info from the existing record
18 - Click 'Link authorities'
19 - The new field is correctly linked to existing authority
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
https://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12299
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If you search for a call number like "M KRUEGER CO #11" in the
cn_browser.pl plugin, your query is cut off at "M KRUEGER CO " because
the hash isn't escaped, so the browser thinks you are opening a
window and trying to navigate to the element with the id 11 rather
than passing the #11 to the server.
To test:
1) Find the record you will use to test, determing the MARC
framework it uses by going to Edit > Edit record > Settings
2) In Administration > MARC bibliographic framework, click MARC
structure in the Actions menu for that framework
3) Navigate to the 952 tag, in the Actions menu click Edit subfields
4) In the tab for o, choose the Plugin cn_browser.pl and click
Save Changes
5) Click the Edit button next to one of the items on your record
6) In the Full call number field, add " CO #11" to the call number
7) Click the ... next to the field to open the Tag editor
8) In the popup window, verify that the search field includes the
" CO #11" you added to the call number
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Previously we put all the servers into an object with keys of the server id
This patch converts it to an array of objects to preserve order, and adjusts code to use the array index
where necessary and store the server id within the array
To test:
1 - Add some new Z3950 servers, they don't need to be valid
FIRST
SECOND
THIRD
FOURTH
2 - Adjust the ranking so FOURTH:1 THIRD:2 SECOND:3 FIRST:4
3 - Enable and launch the advanced editor
4 - Click 'Advanced' under search on the left
5 - Note the list displays in the order you entered the servers
6 - Apply patch
7 - Reload
8 - Order is correct
9 - With valid servers, confirm that searching still works and servers can be checked or unchecked to include/remove from results
https://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17515
Signed-off-by: B Johnson <barbara.johnson@bedfordtx.gov>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Also adds syspref to optionally choose to embed item information in record when adding/editing bibliographic and item records.
Test plan:
1. Enable OAI-PMH and OAI-PMH:AutoUpdateSets sysprefs
2. Create a biblio record with 1 item with CCODE of NFIC
3. In Administration > OAI Sets configuration create a set and define
the mapping:
Field: 952, Subfield: 8, Operator: is equal to, Value: FIC
4. Run the build_oai_sets.pl script:
cd misc/migration_tools
sudo koha-shell <instancename>
./build_oai_sets.pl -i
5. Check what items are in the OAI set:
sudo koha-mysql <instancename>
select * from oai_sets_biblios;
6. Observe your bib from step 2 is not in the set
7. [ITEM EDIT] Edit the item to have CCODE of FIC repeat step 5 and observe biblio is still not in OAI set
8. [ITEM ADD] Add a new item with CCODE of FIC and repeat step 5 and observe biblio
still not in OAI set
9. [ITEM DELETE] Delete one of your 2 items and repeat step 5 and observe biblio still
not in OAI set
10. Apply patch, update database and restart plack (instruction below on
the latter 2 actions):
cd installer/data/mysql
sudo koha-shell <instancename>
./updatedatabase.pl
sudo koha-plack --restart <instancename>
11. Enable new syspref OAI-PMH:AutoUpdateSetsEmbedItemData
12. [ITEM ADD] Repeat step 8 and observe biblio is now in the OAI set
13. [ITEM EDIT] Edit both items to have a CCODE of NFIC and repeat step 5 and
observe bib now not in set
14. [ITEM EDIT] Edit one of the items to have CCODE of FIC and repeat step 5
and observe bib now in set
15. [ITEM DELETE] Delete all items off bib and repeat step 5 and observe bib
no longer in set
Sponsored-By: Catalyst IT
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch makes some minor changes to the JavaScript generated by the
cataloging plugins: <script> "type" attribute removed; single-line
comments converted to multi-line style; obsolete //<![CDATA[ marks
removed.
These changes help the JavaScript conform to current coding guidelines.
The comment style change allows for whitespace in the scripts to be
collapsed by the Template::Toolkit "collapse" filter.
Since the patch makes small cosmetic changes to many files it may be
easiest to test this patch by visually inspecting the changes.
It's also simple to test some plugins which are enabled by default (at
least in MARC21): In the basic MARC editor, the leader, 007, and 008. In
the item editor, subfield d - Date acquired.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Currently we apply weighting to all searches except advanced search. The theory
being that when selecting indexes we don't want to apply weights. When searching
in ES weights are only applied to relevant results so it doesn't matter.
i.e. if weighting author*100 but searching subject, a term matching the subject search in author
is not boosted.
Given this, we should always apply weights, unless the user wishes not to
To test:
1 - Set some weighting
2 - Do some searches
3 - Note your terms and results, try advanced and regular searches specifying indexes or not
4 - Apply patch
5 - Note that opac and staff advanced search have option to apply weights
6 - Compare searches after the patch to see how weighting affects, it should be beneficial or not at all
Signed-off-by: Myka Kennedy Stephens <mkstephens@lancasterseminary.edu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch modifies additem.pl so that it can accept an itemnumber as
a single parameter.
To test, apply the patch edit items on a bibliographic record which has
one or more items.
- In the location bar, modify the URL so that it uses only the
itemnumber parameter, e.g.
/cgi-bin/koha/cataloguing/additem.pl?itemnumber=12345
The page should load the correct record's items.
- If you add the "op" parameter it should load the item for editing in
the form:
/cgi-bin/koha/cataloguing/additem.pl?itemnumber=12345&op=edititem
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When batch editing, 2 reindex calls are sent to ES/Zebra.
We can easily avoid that reusing the skip_modzebra_update (renamed skip_record_index)
Additionally we should only send one request for biblio, and we should
only do it if we succeed
As the whole batch mod is in a transaction it is possible to fail in which case
Zebra queue is reset, but ES indexes have already been set
In addition to the skip param this patchset moves Zebra and Elasticsearch calls to
Indexer modules and introduces a generic Koha::SearchEngine::Indexer so that we don't
need to check the engine when calling for index
The new index_records routine takes an array so that we can reduce the calls to
the ES server.
The index_records routine for Zebra loops over ModZebra to avoid affecting current behaviour
Test plan:
General tests, under both search engines:
1 - Add a biblio and confirm it is searchable
2 - Edit the biblio and confirm changes are searchable
3 - Add an item, confirm it is searchable
4 - Delete an item, confirm it is not searchable
5 - Delete a biblio, confirm it is not searchable
6 - Add an authority and confirm it is searchable
7 - Delete an authority and confirm it is not searchable
Batch mod tests, under both search engines
1 - Have a bib with several items, none marked 'not for loan'
2 - Do a staff search that returns this biblio
3 - Items show as available
4 - Click on title to go to details page
5 - Edit->Item in a batch
6 - Set the not for loan status for all items
7 - Repeat your search
8 - Items show as not for loan
9 - Test batch deleting items
a - Test with a list of items, not deleting bibs
b - Test with a list of items, deleting bibs if no items remain where all items are only item on a biblio:
SELECT MAX(barcode) FROM items GROUP BY biblionumber HAVING COUNT(barcode) IN (1)
c - Test with a list of items, deleting bibs if no items remain where some items are the only item on a biblio:
SELECT MAX(barcode) FROM items GROUP BY biblionumber HAVING COUNT(barcode) IN (1,2)
10 - Confirm records are update/deleted as appropriate
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds a new cataloging plugin for MARC21 installations,
marc21_field-260b.pl. When enabled it provides autocomplete for
publisher name, pulling existing data from biblioitems.publishercode.
To test, apply the patch and enable the plugin:
- Go to Administration -> MARC bibliographic framework -> MARC structure
-> 260 -> Edit subfields -> Subfield b -> Other options.
- Set "Plugin" to marc21_field_260b.pl.
- Go to Cataloging and edit or create a record.
- Under tab 2 click the field for 260$b. Start typing a publisher name.
A dropdown should appear with matching publishers.
- Selecting one of the results should populate the form field with that
information.
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Also works with 264$b.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
.pm must not have -x
.t must have -x
.pl must have -x
Test plan:
Apply only the first patch, run the tests and confirm that the failures
make sense
Apply this patch and confirm that the test now returns green
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch updates the basic MARC editor to provide a plugin name
variable to the template, allowing us to make a check on the name and
conditionally show an upload link if the "upload.pl" cataloging plugin
is selected.
To test, apply the patch and rebuild the staff client CSS
(https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Working_with_SCSS_in_the_OPAC_and_staff_client).
- Go do Administration -> MARC bibliographic framework -> MARC
structure -> 856 -> Edit subfields.
- Edit the "u" subfield and select "upload.pl" as the plugin under
"Other options."
- Go to Cataloging and create or edit a MARC record.
- Under tab 8 look for the 856 tag, subfield u. There should be an
"Upload" link corresponding to the form field.
- Click the upload link to confirm that it triggers a popup window with
the upload form.
- Confirm that other similar plugin links (for instance 100$a, 600$a)
display the old "tag editor" icon.
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisetteslatah@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It defaults to 0 in get_template_and_user
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We do a bit of refactoring to make the code reusable.
Test plan:
Same as the first patch but when adding/editing an item
QA note: There is a warning from the QA tools
FAIL koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/en/modules/cataloguing/additem.tt
FAIL js_in_body
A <script> tag found inside head, must be moved to the body (see bug 17858)
I don't think how we could avoid it.
Sponsored-by: Orex Digital
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This whole patch set adds the ability to create a new authorised value
directly from the cataloguing module.
It will prevent the cataloger to leave and reload the page if they need
a new one.
Test plan:
If you are logged in with a patron with the manage_authorised_values
subpermission you will be able to:
* Edit a bibliographic record
* Search for a subfield linked to an authorised values (not the "fake"
AV like itemtypes, branches, cn)
* Click the dropdown list and start searching for a value that does not
exist
* Click enter
* Fill the fields in the popup
* Save
=> Your dropdown list has the new AV :)
Note: This does not work for the advanced editor. It does not have
select2 applied to the selects. I have hardly tried but failed.
Sponsored-by: Orex Digital
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If an item is marked as found (ie. not itemlost) we need to refund the
patron.
Test plan:
Mark an item as lost to create a fee for the patron
Mark it as found from the cataloguing module and confirm that the patron
is refunded
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds the ability to jump back to the search result after a
record has been deleted.
Also it keeps the "browser" when all items are deleted from a
bibliographic record
Test plan:
- Start a new search
- Select a record with items
- Delete all the items
=> You still see the browser
- Delete the record
=> You are back to the adv search form but we new link "Go back to the
results" is present at the top of the page
Limitation: As we delete the record we do not longer know the offset,
we are back to the first page of the result list
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch modifies the code for parsing MARC framework configurations
so that the placeholder "<<YY>>" translates to a two-year date.
To test, apply the patch and modify a framework to include placeholders.
For example, in MARC21:
- Administration -> MARC structure -> 952 -> Edit subfields -> d
- Expand "Advanced constraints" and add a default value:
<<YYYY>> <<YY>> <<MM>> <<DD>> <<USER>>
- Save your configuration and go to Cataloging.
- Go to the add/edit items page for a record which uses the framework
you edited.
- In the "Add item" form, in the "Date aquired" field, you should see
the correct values. For example: '2019 19 12 03 Leonard'
Perform the same test when adding an item during the Acquisitions
process (depending on your AcqCreateItem setting).
Note that acqui/neworderempty.pl has been modified because the
placeholder-replacement code is repeated there, but I couldn't discover
how to test it (if it is used at all?)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test Plan:
1) Configure Claimes Returned
2) Apply this patch
3) Go to additem.pl for that item
4) Note the claims returned lost status does not show in the lost status pulldown
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When editing items, the table at the top contain several columns that
have date values, but they cannot be sorted by dates correctly.
Test plan:
Have several items with different dates in columns that contain dates,
like items.dateaccessioned, items.datelastseen)
Sort the column and confirm that with this patch the lines are sorted
correctly
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Same as the precedent patch for a single item deletion (vs delete all
items)
Item is returned if deletion successful, not 1
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To Test:
1- Edit your default framework, connect any subfield outside of the 952 to an authorised value (for example, connect the 942$n to the Yes_No auth value)
2 - Find a record in that framework
3 - Edit the record and find your subfield
4 - The subfield shows a dropdown with no contents
5 - check plack log, see "DBD::mysql::st execute failed: 'koha_kohadev.authorised_values.authorised_value' isn't in GROUP BY "
6 - apply patch, restart all
7 - reload edit record page, see your auth value dropdown has contents
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1 - Have a record with some items
2 - Click 'Delete all' under 'Edit'
3 - Confirm deletion
4 - Note you are redirected to additem.pl
5 - Add an item
6 - Apply patch
7 - Delete all items again
8 - Note you are redirected to detail.pl
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Issue description:
- call to ModZebra was unconditional inside 'store' method for Koha::Item,
so it was after each item added, or deleted.
- ModZebra called with param biblionumber, so it is the same parameter
across calls for each items with same biblionumber, especially when we
adding/removing in a batch.
- with ElasticSearch enabled this makes even more significant load
and it is also progressively grows when more items already in DB
Solution:
- to add extra parameter 'skip_modzebra_update' and propagate it down to
'store' method call to prevent call of ModZebra,
- but to call ModZebra once after the whole batch loop in the upper layer
Test plan / how to replicate:
- make sure that you have in the admin settings "SearchEngine" set to
"Elasticsearch" and your ES is configured and working
( /cgi-bin/koha/admin/preferences.pl?op=search&searchfield=SearchEngine )
- select one of biblioitems without items
( /cgi-bin/koha/cataloguing/additem.pl?biblionumber=XXX )
- press button "add multiple copies of this item",
- enter 200 items, start measuring time and submit the page/form...
On my test machine when adding 200 items 3 times in a row (so 600 in
total, but to show that time grows with every next batch gradually):
WHEN ElasticSearch DISABLED (only Zebra queue):
- 9s, 12s, 13s
WHEN ElasticSearch ENABLED:
- 1.3m, 3.2m, 4.8m
WITH PATCH WHEN ElasticSearch ENABLED:
- 10s, 13s, 15s
Same slowness (because also same call to ModZebra) happens when you try
to delete all items ("op=delallitems"). And same fix.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Improves the documentation of the script a bit, but makes one
important change:
-If no prefix is submitted, or prefix does not contain only
-numbers, it returns the inserted code (= keep a field unchanged)
+If no prefix is submitted, or the prefix does contain only
+numbers, it returns the inserted code (= keep the field unchanged).
To test:
- Add an authorised INVENTORY value with 2020 as prefix
- After linking the stocknumberAV.pl to the 952$i in the frameworks
- Edit an item
- Add 2020 in the stocknumber field
- Trigger plugin
- Verify nothing happens
If the prefix contains only numbers... nothing happens.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
- nubers => numbers
- some vertical spacing
- !}fmt -w65
- "contains of letters" => "containing letters"
TEST PLAN
---------
perldoc cataloguing/value_builder/stocknumberAV.pl
apply patch
perldoc cataloguing/value_builder/stocknumberAV.pl
-- after the patch is more readable.
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch:
- changes SQL to Koha::AuthorisedValues
- remove type param from script tag
- fixes the plugin description
0) Do not apply the patch
1) Set the plugin
1.1) Update a biblio framework and link plugin stocknumberAV.pl to some item
subfield
1.2) Add authorised values category called "INVENTORY"
1.3) Add some authorised values: authorised value is prefix and
description is a current stock/inventory number
2) Add an item and try to use this plugin to ensure you set it
correctly
2.1) Use a defined prefix to see if the number is correct
2.2) Ensure the number is correctly incremented in authorised values
2.3) Use not defined prefix to see the error message
2.4) Insert a not prefix string (eg number) to see it is not changed
3) Apply the patch
4) Repeat 2) and see it is working the same
5) Look into patch and confirm the description does make sense and is
rigth according to what you see in UI
6) Sign off :D
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Wrong replacement in additem.pl
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Starting to replace the ModItem calls with Koha::Item->store
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch fixes the formatting of dates on the following pages:
- catalogue/MARCdetail.pl (staff)
- cataloguing/additem.pl (staff)
- opac-MARCdetail.pl (opac)
To test:
1) Ensure that the following fields are visible in the opac, intranet
and editor. You may need to edit the subfields in your default
bibliographic framework
952$d date accessioned
952$q date due/on loan
952$r date last seen
952$s date last borrowed
952$w replacement price date
Also ensure you have dateformat system preference set
2) Go to cataloguing/additem.pl for a biblio. Fill in the fields above
if required. Save
3) Remain on cataloguing/additem.pl. Notice the items table at the top
of the page, the dates are in the generic yyyy-mm-dd format
4) Go to catalogue/MARCdetail.pl for that biblio. Notice dates in wrong
format
5) View this biblio in the opac opac-MARCdetail.pl. Scroll to bottom to
items table. Notice dates in wrong format.
6) Apply patch, restart memcached and plack and refresh pages
7) Dates should now be formatted according to dateformat preference
8) Confirm that changing the preference changes the format of the dates
Sponsored-by: Catalyst IT
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
At the last development meeting we have voted to remove the
QueryParser-related code
https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Development_IRC_meeting_19_February_2020
Hea tells us that it has not been adopted, and the code/bug tracker that
it is not really usable as it. As nobody is willing to work on it, we
decided to remove it instead.
Test plan:
% prove t/db_dependent/Search.t
must return green
See commits from bug 9239 and confirm that the code is removed in this
patch.
Also play with the search on the UI and confirm that you do not see
obvious regressions
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 9978 should have fixed them all, but some were missing.
We want all the license statements part of Koha to be identical, and
using the GPLv3 statement.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1 - Apply patch, update database
2 - Note new syspref 'DumpSearchQueryTemplate'
3 - Leave it off
4 - Enable DumpTemplateVariablesOpac and Staff
5 - Search on staff and opac
6 - View the source
7 - Search for 'search_query' - you shouldn't find it
8 - Enable the new pref
9 - Repeat, but you should find the query
10 - Test staff/opac search and advanced search, cataloguing search, authority search, authfinder search, adding to a basket form a new biblio
11 - All should work and show the query
12 - This will work under both ES and Zebra
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test plan:
1) Apply the patch
2) Have a Z39.50 endpoint with attr 31 defined - Library of Congress
supports this
3) Try to find some biblio records through Z39.50 using the new field
"Publication year"
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This does a few things:
* We fetch the cn_sort from the DB and use this rather than calculating based on DefaultClassificationSource
We were already pulling based on the items source, so this should not change things
* Rather than using JS to submit the form, it submits via html
* Fix subtitle display and add barcode (it was retrieved in one query but not used)
* Add option to apply different classification scheme to the search
To test:
1 - Add cn_browser.pl to the 'plugin' field in a framework for 952$o
2 - Edit an item on a record in that framework
3 - Enter an itemcallnumber
4 - Click the two dots to launch the callnumber browser
5 - Note the results
6 - Apply patch
7 - Repeat
8 - Note subtitles and barcodes are displayed in results
9 - Note callnumbers are appropriate
10 - Try changing the class source used
11 - Try this with differing dewey,lcc, and other callnumbers
12 - Ensure results are as expected
Signed-off-by: Myka Kennedy Stephens <mkstephens@lancasterseminary.edu>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This fix permits to add an "Important" option to the marc structure pages.
Testing:
1) Apply the patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Regenerate CSS
4) Define 100 as an "important" field ( Administration » MARC bibliographic framework » MARC structure ( Default Frameword) » Edit )
5) Define 100$a as an "important" subfield (Administration » MARC bibliographic framework » MARC structure (Default Frameword) » Subfield » Onglet a)
6) Edit a record to clear the field 100 (subfields are all blank)
7) Save the record.
8) Validate the following message:
A few important fields are not filled:
* tag 100 subfield a Nom de personne in tab
* Field 100 is important, at least one of its subfields should be filled.
Are you sure you want to save?
Sponsored by the CCSR ( http://www.ccsr.qc.ca )
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1 - Go to Cataloguing
2 - New from Z3950
3 - Find an import a record
4 - Check the plack logs:
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /kohadevbox/koha/cataloguing/addbiblio.pl line 565.
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /kohadevbox/koha/cataloguing/addbiblio.pl line 580.
Use of uninitialized value $frameworkcode in string eq at /kohadevbox/koha/cataloguing/addbiblio.pl line 711.
Use of uninitialized value $frameworkcode in string eq at /kohadevbox/koha/cataloguing/addbiblio.pl line 715.
Use of uninitialized value $frameworkcode in string eq at /kohadevbox/koha/cataloguing/addbiblio.pl line 734.
5 - Apply patch
6 - Repeat
7 - No new errors
8 - Confirm selecting 'Default' from 'New from Z3950' dropdown also generates no errors
Signed-off-by: Myka Kennedy Stephens <mkstephens@lancasterseminary.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>