After items search result when entering a term in date due colum filter
table is not filtered.
Its is because columns from 'Issue' must be added in _SearchItems_build_where_fragment()
like it has been added in SearchItems().
Test plan :
1) Perform an item search with some results beeing checked-out
2) In colum 'Date due' enter a number that is contained is some due
dates, ie '2022'
3) Table results are filtered with items having search term in due date
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Items can now only be filtered by 'Checked out' or 'not' rather than
looking at damaged/itemlost/withdrawn/notforloan status.
Removed availability column as Checked out items are made clear by the
due date column.
Signed-off-by: Christian Stelzenmüller <christian.stelzenmueller@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Confirm tests in t/db_dependent/Items.t still pass.
Signed-off-by: Christian Stelzenmüller <christian.stelzenmueller@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This enhancement adds the availability of an item to the item search
results (i.e. shows if checked out or not). If checked out,
shows due date in item search results. The due
date column will also show when exporting results to a CSV file.
To test:
1) Apply patch and restart services
2) Set up two items. Check out Item A to a borrower. Leave Item B as
is not checked out, and not unavailable status.
3) Go to Search -> Item search. Scroll down and notice the Availability
radio options - Ignore, and Checked out.
4) Leave the Ignore option selected and do a search so that both items show.
5) Confirm the availability and due date columns are showing at the
right end of the table. Confirm Item A says Checked out and has a due
date. Confirm Item B says available.
6) Export all result to CSV. Confirm the results show in the CSV file as
expected.
7) Go to edit your search. Select the 'Checked out' radio option for
Availability and submit the search. Confirm only Item A shows in the
results (not Item B).
Sponsored-by: Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum Baden-Württemberg (BSZ)
Signed-off-by: Christian Stelzenmüller <christian.stelzenmueller@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Some more cases found using
$ git grep '\->search(' | grep -v -e '\->as_list' -e '\->get_column' \
| grep '@'
and then manually looking at them.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
To test:
1 - Populate system preference NewItemsDefaultLocation
2 - Stage a file of marc records
3 - Create an acquisitions basket with 'AcqCreateItems' set to 'ordering'
4 - Attempt to add to basket from your staged file
5 - You get a 500 error, and in the logs:
Can't use string ("") as a HASH ref while "strict refs" in use at /usr/share/koha/lib/C4/Items.pm line 1605.
6 - Apply patch
7 - Repeat #4
8 - Success!
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There is a "tabloop" variable that is passed from the add item form logic to the cataloguing plugins.
But there is confusion, sometimes it's an iterator ($i) and sometimes (batchMod.pl) an array.
Actually this tabloop variable is never used from cataloguing plugins, we should remove it.
Test plan:
Read the code and confirm the above.
You can also test a couple of plugins and confirm that they are still
working.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
* C4/Items.pm
- Koha::Biblios not used
* Koha/Item.pm
- Koha::Item->orders must return an empty set if no order attached
- no_triggers should be passed to other update calls
* Item.t
- No need to build a fund
- Add new test to test Koha::Item->orders when no order attached
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch allows merging of records with many items without the web server timing out.
Test plan:
Without the patch:
- Create 2 records (one with e.g. 1000 items).
- Do a cataloguing search that displays both records, select them and click "Merge selected".
- Choose the record with many items as the one to be eliminated.
- Start the merging.
- After a while the web server should give you a timeout error (the merging process may still continue)
With the patch:
- Do the same as above
- This time verify that the records are merged without timeout
- Create a new biblio with an item
- Add with the item:
* acquisition order
* hold (reserve)
- Merge the biblio to another one
- Verify that the item and its related data was moved
- Verify that tests pass:
prove -v t/db_dependent/Koha/Biblio.t
prove -v t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
prove -v t/db_dependent/Koha/SearchEngine/Indexer.t
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Rebased-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
GetItemsInfo sorts the items using serial fields if the biblio is
defined as a serial
The fields may not be defined. We can add a fallback to blank in this case
To test:
1 - Mark a record with items as serial in the marc (942$s)
2 - At least one of the items should have no enumchron defined
3 - Load the detail page
4 - Warns in logs:
[WARN] Use of uninitialized value in string comparison (cmp) at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Items.pm line 811.
5 - Apply patch and restart all
6 - Reload the details page
7 - No more warns
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
On bug 17591 we discovered that there was something weird going on with
the way we export and use subroutines/modules.
This patch tries to standardize our EXPORT to use EXPORT_OK only.
That way we will need to explicitely define the subroutine we want to
use from a module.
This patch is a squashed version of:
Bug 17600: After export.pl
Bug 17600: After perlimport
Bug 17600: Manual changes
Bug 17600: Other manual changes after second perlimports run
Bug 17600: Fix tests
And a lot of other manual changes.
export.pl is a dirty script that can be found on bug 17600.
"perlimport" is:
git clone https://github.com/oalders/App-perlimports.git
cd App-perlimports/
cpanm --installdeps .
export PERL5LIB="$PERL5LIB:/kohadevbox/koha/App-perlimports/lib"
find . \( -name "*.pl" -o -name "*.pm" \) -exec perl App-perlimports/script/perlimports --inplace-edit --no-preserve-unused --filename {} \;
The ideas of this patch are to:
* use EXPORT_OK instead of EXPORT
* perltidy the EXPORT_OK list
* remove '&' before the subroutine names
* remove some uneeded use statements
* explicitely import the subroutines we need within the controllers or
modules
Note that the private subroutines (starting with _) should not be
exported (and not used from outside of the module except from tests).
EXPORT vs EXPORT_OK (from
https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2010/06/perl-exporter-examples/)
"""
Export allows to export the functions and variables of modules to user’s namespace using the standard import method. This way, we don’t need to create the objects for the modules to access it’s members.
@EXPORT and @EXPORT_OK are the two main variables used during export operation.
@EXPORT contains list of symbols (subroutines and variables) of the module to be exported into the caller namespace.
@EXPORT_OK does export of symbols on demand basis.
"""
If this patch caused a conflict with a patch you wrote prior to its
push:
* Make sure you are not reintroducing a "use" statement that has been
removed
* "$subroutine" is not exported by the C4::$MODULE module
means that you need to add the subroutine to the @EXPORT_OK list
* Bareword "$subroutine" not allowed while "strict subs"
means that you didn't imported the subroutine from the module:
- use $MODULE qw( $subroutine list );
You can also use the fully qualified namespace: C4::$MODULE::$subroutine
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This was causing extra warnings when the permanent_location field was
unmapped.
We only need to check if there is a field defined as you can define a mapping
without both a field and subfield, so the existence of one implies the other
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If permanent location is mapped, it will exist in the MARC.
However, when we are transforming our item hash to MARC,
we are losing our permanent location mapping, at least in unit tests.
By checking the original MARC for the permenent location, we remove the
risk of losing it the "empty" permenent location through the
transformation process. We only need to know that it existed in the
original item marc to know we need to update it in the database.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Rhonda Kuiper <rkuiper@roundrocktexas.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch makes all places in Koha that rely on OpacHiddenItems
actually use C4::Context->yaml_preference instead of manually calling
the YAML libraries and handling it.
To test:
1. Apply this patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Items* \
t/db_dependent/Koha/Item* \
t/db_dependent/Koha/Filter/EmbedItems.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
3. Try hiding things with opac-ISBDdetail.pl and opac-search.pl
=> SUCCESS: Things work the same!
4. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The syspref NewItemsDefaultLocation is used to set a default value for item's location.
But it seems that there are some weirdness in the behaviour:
1. It's only used from additem. It seems that it should be used from acq and serial modules as well. And maybe for the items import too.
2. It set the location even if another one has been picked from the UI
=> We UI must preselect the syspref's value, but the controller must pick what has been selected on the UI
This patch is adding the default to the UI and extend the use of the
pref to other areas.
Test plan:
Set a value to NewItemsDefaultLocation
Catalogue a new item and confirm that the syspref's value is picked to
selected the default value on the add item form
Same behaviour should apply to the acquisition and serial modules
When importing items, the default location must be used if the imported
items did not have a location defined.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
C4::Items::ModItemTransfer is used throughout the codebase and currently
it will never set the daterequested or datecancelled fields. With the
modifications to how circulation deals with transfers we need to update
this function to set those fields appropriately. Functionality has been
retained, ModItemTransfer will continue to add a transfer regardless of
limits or current transits existing.
Signed-off-by: Kathleen Milne <kathleen.milne@cne-siar.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Sponsored-by: Orex Digital
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There is a difference between YAML::Load and YAML::XS::Load
From YAML::XS pod:
"YAML::XS only deals with streams of utf8 octets"
Test plan:
We are going to test 1 occurence and QA will confirm others don't
contain typos.
0. Don't apply the patches
1. Create a new itemtype with code=❤️
2. Create a new item using this itemtype (to biblionumber=1 will work)
3. Fill OpacHiddenItems with
itype: [❤️]
4. Search for "street shuffle" or any terms that will return the biblio
Notice that the item is there (there is an error in logs)
5. Apply the patches
6. Repeat 4 and confirm that the item is now hidden
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
From tht YAML pod:
"""
This module has been released to CPAN as YAML::Old, and soon YAML.pm will be changed to just be a frontend interface module for all the various Perl YAML implementation modules, including YAML::Old.
If you want robust and fast YAML processing using the normal Dump/Load API, please consider switching to YAML::XS. It is by far the best Perl module for YAML at this time. It requires that you have a C compiler, since it is written in C.
"""
See also
https://gitlab.com/koha-community/qa-test-tools/-/merge_requests/35
Test plan:
Try some place where YAML::XS is not used and confirm that it works
correctly
QA note: This patch removes some uses of YAML that were not useful
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds the ability to filter inventory by item type. Multiple
item types can be selected at once.
To test:
1) Apply patch and restart services.
2) Set up (at least) one item of a specific item type.
3) Go to Tools -> Inventory.
4) Scroll down to find the item types filter. Confirm the 'select all'
and 'clear all' buttons work as expected.
5) Select a few item types, but DO NOT include the item type that you
just set for your item. Confirm that your item does not show in the
results.
6) Go back to the Inventory tool. This time submit a search that DOES
include the item type you just set for your item. Confirm that your item
does show in the results.
7) Confirm tests pass:
prove t/db_dependent/Items/GetItemsForInventory.t
Sponsored-by: Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum Baden-Württemberg (BSZ)
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Stelzenmüller <christian.stelzenmueller@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This is a bit dirty, cn_sort is not passed from the UI but built in
Koha::Item->store depending on the values of itemcallnumber and
cn_source.
It must be updated only if one of those 2 attributes are modified.
The problem is that, as it's not passed, $item->{cn_sort} does not exist,
and set_or_blank will set it to undef.
The trick here is to backup the value before set_or_blank and set it
back to the item object.
Another solution would be to force the processing of cn_sort each time
we call Koha::Item->store. I don't think that's a good idea.
Test plan:
- Create a new item with a cn_source value and an itemcallnumber value
- write a quick report to see the cn_sort value: SELECT cn_sort FROM items WHERE itemnumber=your itemnumber, see your item has a cn_sort value
- edit your item and save it without changing either the cn_source of the itemcallnumber
- run your report again, cn_sort is not modified
- edit your item, changing either the cn_source or itemcallnumber
- run report again, cn_sort is modified as expected
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Tested with :
For a framework (not the default) :
Creation of a biblio record
Edition of this biblio record
Creation of an item of this record
Creation of an item of this record
./misc/batchRepairMissingBiblionumbers.pl OK
prove t/db_dependent/Biblio/ModBiblioMarc.t OK
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In items search, add a filter on value of items.new_status with a Ignore/Yes/No.
Yes meaning != 0, No meaning = 0, with considering that NULL value is like 0.
This patch adds 'isnull' option to filter, this may be reused on other
fields.
Test plan :
1) Define an item subfield on items.new_status with authorised values YES_NO (0 or 1)
2) Edit an item A to set new_status=1
3) Edit an item B to set new_status=0
4) Perform an item search with 'is new' = 'ignore' => you get all items
5) Perform an item search with 'is new' = 'yes' => you get item A
6) Perform an item search with 'is new' = 'no' => you get all items but A
Signed-off-by: Emmi Takkinen <emmi.takkinen@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch simply passes skip_record_index calls to Koha:Item:store
for all the changes done in AddReturn.
Testing is really verifiying that items are still correctly indexed at the end
For both search engines
To test:
1 - Find or create a record with multipel items
2 - Populate both:
UpdateItemLocationOnCheckin
UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin
3 - Confirm that checking in an item correctly updates the item status in search results
4 - Test with items issued, and items not issued
5 - Test when generating a transfer (checkin at different branch)
6 - Test when item was marked lost
7 - Test when filling transfer
Signed-off-by: Séverine Queune <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When batch editing, 2 reindex calls are sent to ES/Zebra.
We can easily avoid that reusing the skip_modzebra_update (renamed skip_record_index)
Additionally we should only send one request for biblio, and we should
only do it if we succeed
As the whole batch mod is in a transaction it is possible to fail in which case
Zebra queue is reset, but ES indexes have already been set
In addition to the skip param this patchset moves Zebra and Elasticsearch calls to
Indexer modules and introduces a generic Koha::SearchEngine::Indexer so that we don't
need to check the engine when calling for index
The new index_records routine takes an array so that we can reduce the calls to
the ES server.
The index_records routine for Zebra loops over ModZebra to avoid affecting current behaviour
Test plan:
General tests, under both search engines:
1 - Add a biblio and confirm it is searchable
2 - Edit the biblio and confirm changes are searchable
3 - Add an item, confirm it is searchable
4 - Delete an item, confirm it is not searchable
5 - Delete a biblio, confirm it is not searchable
6 - Add an authority and confirm it is searchable
7 - Delete an authority and confirm it is not searchable
Batch mod tests, under both search engines
1 - Have a bib with several items, none marked 'not for loan'
2 - Do a staff search that returns this biblio
3 - Items show as available
4 - Click on title to go to details page
5 - Edit->Item in a batch
6 - Set the not for loan status for all items
7 - Repeat your search
8 - Items show as not for loan
9 - Test batch deleting items
a - Test with a list of items, not deleting bibs
b - Test with a list of items, deleting bibs if no items remain where all items are only item on a biblio:
SELECT MAX(barcode) FROM items GROUP BY biblionumber HAVING COUNT(barcode) IN (1)
c - Test with a list of items, deleting bibs if no items remain where some items are the only item on a biblio:
SELECT MAX(barcode) FROM items GROUP BY biblionumber HAVING COUNT(barcode) IN (1,2)
10 - Confirm records are update/deleted as appropriate
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch modifies the code for parsing MARC framework configurations
so that the placeholder "<<YY>>" translates to a two-year date.
To test, apply the patch and modify a framework to include placeholders.
For example, in MARC21:
- Administration -> MARC structure -> 952 -> Edit subfields -> d
- Expand "Advanced constraints" and add a default value:
<<YYYY>> <<YY>> <<MM>> <<DD>> <<USER>>
- Save your configuration and go to Cataloging.
- Go to the add/edit items page for a record which uses the framework
you edited.
- In the "Add item" form, in the "Date aquired" field, you should see
the correct values. For example: '2019 19 12 03 Leonard'
Perform the same test when adding an item during the Acquisitions
process (depending on your AcqCreateItem setting).
Note that acqui/neworderempty.pl has been modified because the
placeholder-replacement code is repeated there, but I couldn't discover
how to test it (if it is used at all?)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Coming from:
Bug 23463: Use new method Koha::Object->set_or_blank
We have DB fields that are not mapped with MARC fields, for instance paidfor. They are not handled correctly.
In ModItemFromMarc, we get a MARC record in parameter and update the item in DB. But we are loosing the fields that are not in the MARC record
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds a .perlcriticrc (copied from qa-test-tools) and fixes
almost all perlcrictic violations according to this .perlcriticrc
The remaining violations are silenced out by appending a '## no critic'
to the offending lines. They can still be seen by using the --force
option of perlcritic
This patch also modify t/00-testcritic.t to check all Perl files using
the new .perlcriticrc.
I'm not sure if this test script is still useful as it is now equivalent
to `perlcritic --quiet .` and it looks like it is much slower
(approximatively 5 times slower on my machine)
Test plan:
1. Run `perlcritic --quiet .` from the root directory. It should output
nothing
2. Run `perlcritic --quiet --force .`. It should output 7 errors (6
StringyEval, 1 BarewordFileHandles)
3. Run `TEST_QA=1 prove t/00-testcritic.t`
4. Read the patch. Check that all changes make sense and do not
introduce undesired behaviour
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This reverts commit 80f1374f26.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This is the same fix as on bug 14662, which fixed the behaviour in
cataloguing, but for the item form in acquisitions.
The code assumes that if a subfield is marked as mandatory, there
should be no empty entry in the pull downs.
This assumption is not correct, as it leads to the first entry of the
pull down being preselected if there is no default set. As the field
can never be 'unset', there will never be a 'required' warning.
Furthermore, it might be counterproductive to use mandatory fields,
as it might be easily forgotten to change the preselected value and
those mistakes will be hard to find.
Correct behaviour would be to preselect the empty value when there is
no default. This means on saving the item an error message is triggered
and the cataloger is forced to set the value.
To test:
- This is best tested with an ACQ framework, but default can be used
when no ACQ framework was created.
- In your MARC bibliographic framework:
- In 952 make itemtype, classification source and some other pull downs
like location or collection mandatory and set them to visibel if needed
- Create a new basket with 'items created while ordering'
- Add a new order, an existing record with 942$c set will work best
- Add items for your order line
- Verify that the first value of each pull down is preselected,
there is no way to trigger the 'required' error
- Apply patch
- Add a new order line
- Verify that classification source is preselected according to the
DefaultClassificationSource system preference (try unsetting it later)
- Verify all mandatory fields can be set to empty
- Verify that you can't save before correctly setting them
- Change your frameworks and set a default for itemtype (Ex: BK) and
another mandatory and non-mandatory field of your choice
- Add a new order line and item and verify the defaults are selected
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Issue description:
- call to ModZebra was unconditional inside 'store' method for Koha::Item,
so it was after each item added, or deleted.
- ModZebra called with param biblionumber, so it is the same parameter
across calls for each items with same biblionumber, especially when we
adding/removing in a batch.
- with ElasticSearch enabled this makes even more significant load
and it is also progressively grows when more items already in DB
Solution:
- to add extra parameter 'skip_modzebra_update' and propagate it down to
'store' method call to prevent call of ModZebra,
- but to call ModZebra once after the whole batch loop in the upper layer
Test plan / how to replicate:
- make sure that you have in the admin settings "SearchEngine" set to
"Elasticsearch" and your ES is configured and working
( /cgi-bin/koha/admin/preferences.pl?op=search&searchfield=SearchEngine )
- select one of biblioitems without items
( /cgi-bin/koha/cataloguing/additem.pl?biblionumber=XXX )
- press button "add multiple copies of this item",
- enter 200 items, start measuring time and submit the page/form...
On my test machine when adding 200 items 3 times in a row (so 600 in
total, but to show that time grows with every next batch gradually):
WHEN ElasticSearch DISABLED (only Zebra queue):
- 9s, 12s, 13s
WHEN ElasticSearch ENABLED:
- 1.3m, 3.2m, 4.8m
WITH PATCH WHEN ElasticSearch ENABLED:
- 10s, 13s, 15s
Same slowness (because also same call to ModZebra) happens when you try
to delete all items ("op=delallitems"). And same fix.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This depends on the framework parameter. Which should be added back to
the call in C4::Items.
Test plan:
[1] Mark in Default framework one subfield A repeatable and B not repeatable.
Go to item editor. (Work on a biblio in Default framework.)
Check saving and reopening these subfields with VAL1 | VAL2.
Subfield A should be cloned, B should be glued as entered.
[2] Mark in another Framework A not repeatable and B repeatable.
Change framework for this biblio.
Go to item editor again. Reopen item. Behavior subfields in reverse?
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ere Maijala <ere.maijala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch fixes an issue when editing items.
* The issue
Cannot blank a subfield when editing an item.
If you have an item with itemcallnumber=42, then edit it, blank it and
save. The itemcallnumber is still 42
* Why? (line numbers from https://gitlab.com/joubu/Koha/-/tree/bug_23463)
additem (and other item's edition forms) receives a list of tags,
subfields and values, generates a MARC::Record::XML then calls
ModItemFromMarc:
717 my $itemtosave=MARC::Record::new_from_xml($xml, 'UTF-8');
727 my $newitem = ModItemFromMarc($itemtosave, $biblionumber,
$itemnumber);
And ModItemFromMarc:
282 my $item = TransformMarcToKoha( $localitemmarc,
$frameworkcode, 'items' );
283 $item->{cn_source} = delete $item->{'items.cn_source'}; #
Because of C4::Biblio::_disambiguate
284 $item_object->set($item);
ModItemFromMarc never knows that the field has been blank.
Prior to bug 23463 we had a map of default values, and ModItemFromMarc
was doing:
426 my $item = TransformMarcToKoha( $localitemmarc,
$frameworkcode, 'items' );
427 my $default_values = _build_default_values_for_mod_marc();
428 foreach my $item_field ( keys %$default_values ) {
429 $item->{$item_field} = $default_values->{$item_field}
430 unless exists $item->{$item_field};
431 }
I do not want to reinsert that list of default values.
Here I wrote a generic method in Koha::Object to set the value passed in parameter,
or "blank" if not passed.
It's nulled if can be set to null in DB, or the default value is retrieved from
the schema info.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
