Test plan:
Run without next patch. Should fail.
Run with next patch. Should pass.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
https://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31881
Make use of Koha::Cache::Memory::Lite to avoid hitting the database and
creating plugins object for every call to Koha::Plugins->call
Test plan:
1. Make sure plugins still work by executing
`prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Plugins/Plugins.t`
2. Run the test script provided in the following patch to see how it
affects performances
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds test data to prove that all authorizations
for subpermissions are set when only a top level flag is set.
To test:
0) Apply patch
1) prove ./t/Koha/Auth/Permissions.t
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch ensures HoldFeeMode is considered when displaying a message
to patrons on the OPAC that says they'll be charged a hold fee when
placing or collecting the hold.
When HoldFeeMode is set to not_always or "only if all items are checked
out and the record has at least one hold already" then the hold fee
message should only show if all items on the record are checked out, AND
the record has at least one hold already - both of these conditions must
be met.
To test:
1. Go to Administration -> Patron categories
2. Edit your patron category and give a hold fee of $1.
3. Go to Administration -> System preferences and search for
HoldFeeMode. Set to 'only if all items are checked out and the record
has at least one hold already' if not already set. Keep this tab open.
4. In another tab, open the OPAC.
5. Search the OPAC for a record with one item which is NOT checked out.
6. Go to place a hold on this record. Confirm you see a message saying
that you will be charged a hold fee, even though not all items are
checked out and the record does not have a hold --> This is the bug.
7. Apply patch and restart services.
Items available, no holds placed
8. Repeat steps 5-6. This time, you should NOT see the hold fee message.
Items available, holds placed
9. In your staff interface tab, find the same record.
10. Place a hold for a different patron on this record.
11. In your OPAC tab, find this record again and go to place a hold. You
should NOT see the hold fee message.
No items available, no holds placed
12. In your staff interface tab, cancel the hold placed on this record.
13. Check out the item to a different patron.
14. In your OPAC tab, find this record again and go to place a hold. You
should NOT see the hold fee message.
No items available, holds placed
15. In your staff interface tab, keep the item checked out to another
patron.
16. Place a hold for a third patron on this record.
17. In your OPAC tab, find this record again and go to place a hold. You
SHOULD see the hold fee message.
Multiple holds
18. Search the OPAC for a record. Make sure your search will return more
than one result, including our test record.
19. Check the checkbox for our test record, plus another record where
the item is not checked out.
20. Click the Place hold button to place holds on all of our selected
records. You should only see the hold fee message above our test record.
21. In your staff interface tab, test setting HoldFeeMode to the other
values and confirm the hold message shows on the OPAC as expected.
22. Confirm tests pass t/db_dependent/Reserves/GetReserveFee.t
Sponsored-by: Horowhenua Libraries Trust
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This will fix t/db_dependent/www/batch.t and t/db_dependent/www/search_utf8.t
QA - improvement ideas welcome! It's definitely not the best we can do.
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/www/search_utf8.t t/db_dependent/www/batch.t
must return green
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
With the follow-up changes, the return value is no longer a scalar, but
a hashref, but the tests weren't updated accordingly.
This patch fixes this situation.
To test:
1. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
=> FAIL: Tests fail
2. Apply this patch
3. Repeat 1
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
4. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This can be used to instruct staff how the item should handled when
it's checked in. For example items notforloan status has been
changed as "Invoiced item" while item has been on loan. When it's
checked in staff sees that they should put item aside for further
processing.
To test:
1. Apply patch and update database if needed
2. Set items notforloan status as -1 (or create new one)
3. Add line "-1: ONLYMESSAGE" to UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin
4. Check item out for patron.
5. Check item in.
=> Description of notforloan status should be displayed.
=> Confirm notforloan status hasn't changed.
Also prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/issue.t
Sponsored-by: Koha-Suomi Oy
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
We are seeing the following lines several times in the codebase
$cache->clear_from_cache("default_value_for_mod_marc-");
But values are never set for this key.
Test plan:
Ask you, "Is the above correct?"
Use the correct 'git grep' and 'git log' and confirm the assertion.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Error while executing command: no such element: Unable to locate element: //*[@id="circ_returns_checkin"]/div[2]/div[1]/div[2]/button at /usr/share/perl5/Selenium/Remote/Driver.pm line 411.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Cannot wait more for element '//input[@type="submit"]' to be visible at /kohadevbox/koha/t/lib/Selenium.pm line 189.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The tests create a new branch to make sure one exists without rules. We then add a rule
and delete it. We can simply create the new branch and never assign a rule
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The code for get_processingreturn_policy was very similar to
get_lostreturn_policy. Combining the two methods allows for use of
get_effective_rules which uses get_effective_rule_value which is cached.
This should reduce lines of code and improve performance
Tests updated and adjusted as well
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This enhancement gives the ability to set a policy for the lost item
processing fee that may get charged additional to the lost item
replacement cost. The processing fee can be:
- refunded
- refunded if unpaid
- kept
To test:
Set-up
1. Find an item, Item A. Go to Administration -> Item types and edit the
item type for Item A. Add a default replacement cost and a processing
fee and Save.
2. Go to Administration -> system preferences and set the following:
- WhenLostChargeReplacementFee: Charge
- BlockReturnOfLostItems: Don't block
3. Scroll down to the default lost item fee refund on return policy. Set
the refund lost item replacement fee policy to 'refund lost item charge'.
4. Edit Item A and set a replacement cost.
Reproduce
5. Check out Item A to Patron A.
6. Click the barcode to view Item A's information. Edit Item A and set
the Lost status to 'lost'.
7. Go back to Patron A's checkouts. The item should now be checked in
with two new charges applied - a lost item fee (the item's replacement
cost) and a lost item processing fee (set in item types).
8. Check in Item A to mark it as found.
9. Go back to Patron A's account. Notice the lost item fee has been
refunded, but the processing fee remains.
10. Manually pay or write off the processing fee. This enhancement
removes the need for this manual step.
11. Apply the patch and restart services
Test with lost item - refund
12. Go to Administration -> circulation and fines rules. Scroll down to
the default lost item fee refund on return policy. Notice there is now a
refund lost item processing fee policy. Set this to 'refund lost item
processing charge'.
13. Repeat steps 6 to 9.
14. Go back to Patron A's account. Both the lost item fee and processing
fee should have been refunded.
15. Repeat steps 6 to 8 (do not check it yet).
16. Go back to Patron A's account. Pay the processing fee.
17. Repeat step 9.
18. Go back to Patron A's account. Both the lost item fee and processing
fee should have been refunded (you'll now be in a credit because the
paid processing fee was also refunded).
Test with lost item - refund_unpaid
19. Go to Administration -> circulation and fines rules. Scroll down to
the default lost item fee refund on return policy. Notice there is now a
refund lost item processing fee policy. Set this to 'refund lost item
processing charge (only if unpaid)'.
20. Repeat steps 6 to 9.
21. Go back to Patron A's account. Both the lost item fee and processing
fee should have been refunded.
22. Repeat steps 16 to 19.
23. Go back to Patron A's account. The lost item fee should have been
refunded but not the processing fee, as this was already paid.
Test with lost item - leave
24. Go to Administration -> circulation and fines rules. Scroll down to
the default lost item fee refund on return policy. Notice there is now a
refund lost item processing fee policy. Set this to 'leave lost item
processing charge'.
25. Repeat steps 6 to 9.
26. Go back to Patron A's account. The lost item fee and processing fee
should have been refunded but not the processing fee.
Other tests
27. Confirm tests pass
- t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
- t/db_dependent/Koha/CirculationRules.t
Sponsored-by: Auckland University of Technology
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Magnus Enger <magnus@libriotech.no>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
To test:
1. prove t/db_dependent/Illrequests.t
2. Observe test failure
1..3
ok 1 - before change, original borrowernumber found
not ok 2 - after change, changed borrowernumber found in holds
# Failed test 'after change, changed borrowernumber found in holds'
# at t/db_dependent/Illrequests.t line 167.
# got: '3786'
# expected: '3787'
ok 3 - after change, changed borrowernumber found in illrequests
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 3.
not ok 4 - store borrowernumber change also updates holds
Signed-off-by: Magnus Enger <magnus@libriotech.no>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
In those rare cases when authorities are updated by an external agency (or
even internally, by reviewing and correcting an exported authority file)
when the heading tag will be changed (seems odd but happens:
111 Congress ==> 110 Corporate body.Congress ;
100 Person ==> 110 Corporate body (a company named with person's name ;
151 City--object ==> 150 Object (city) etc.)
and then the authority record in Koha database will be updated with
bulkmarcimport or by calling directly ModAuthority from a custom script,
the merge function "doesn't know" that the change to the authority type
has been made and, consequently, doesn't adequately change the tag in
related fields in biblio records (as it would if two different records
with different authtypecode were merged with Koha interface).
This is because at the moment when merge function is being called
by ModAuthority:
Koha::Authority::Types->find($autfrom->authtypecode)
Koha::Authority::Types->find($authto->authtypecode)
both have the same value (because $mergefrom == $mergeto).
Therefore in case when $mergefrom == $mergeto and the heading tag changes,
$authtypefrom and $authfrom calculated in merge in the ordinar way are
misleading and should not be taken unto consideration.
Test plan:
==========
1. run t/db_dependent/Authority/Merge.t
2. you should see problems in "Test update A with modified heading tag
(changing authtype)"
3. apply the patch
4. run t/db_dependent/Authority/Merge.t again
5. the test should pass
Alternatively:
1. have an authority record used in biblio;
export it to file;
change 1XX heading tag to a different (but reasonable) value
and possibly change also the content of the heading
(one can delete also 942 but it doesn't matter);
make bulkmarcimport.pl -a -update -file <modified_auth_file> and
see that the tag in biblio record has not been changed (whereas
the type of authority record did change);
2. make orders in database (so that the authority type and the tag of
the field in biblio record correspond); apply the patch;
3. repeat the test from 1.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
We are now using the patron category selects on almost all system
preferences, but OpacHiddenItemsExceptions was still missing.
To test:
- Before applying the patch:
- Add patron categories to OpacHiddenItemsExceptions using |
- Add configuration to OpacHiddenItems
- Verify all works as expected in the OPAC
- Apply patch, run database update
- Verify the system preference shows the correct settings from before
- Verify feature still works as expected
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
SendPasswordRecoveryEmail relies on the calling script to tell if there is an
existing valid recovery already. If there's an expired recovery-entry the
members/notices.pl script will try to create a new entry resulting in a duplicate
key error.
This patch fixes the bug by removing the need for the calling script to do the check as
since SendPasswordRecoveryEmail does the same thing anyway.
SendPasswordRecoveryEmail will now use DBIx ->update_or_create instead of looking at
the $update param to determine if it should update an existing entry or create a new.
The update param is removed from all calling scripts and test are updated.
To test:
1. Generate a password recovery mail for a patron
2. Let it expire.
3. Generate a new password recovery from staff to the same patron - Fail!
4: Apply patch
5. Generate a new password recovery from staff to the same patron - Success!
6. Opac password recovery flow should also work.
7. Tests pass.
Sponsored-by: Lund University Library
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds support for searching additional_fields when retrieving
invoices using C4::Acquisition::Invoices.
To test:
1. Apply this patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
3. Sign off :-D
Sponsored-by: The Research University in the Helmholtz Association (KIT)
Signed-off-by: Michaela Sieber <michaela.sieber@kit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds a tst for copy without subfields. I also clarify what eachstep does
so the next user/coder understands current behaviour
Update existing or add new: In the case where the field/subfield exists
we update, if we have two fields - one with the subfield, and one without, we
add the subfield to the one without
Copy field:
- If given a subfield - we will add to existing fields in the record
- If not given a subfield - we create an entirely new field
The logic of all of this is tricky, makes sense in a certain light, any complaints
are for a new bug :-)
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
Run test again.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Move a few tests into separate subtests.
Replace the BEGIN block.
Test plan:
Run test again.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
Run test again.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Replacing the vars statement.
Adding a larger subtest.
Removing TransformVersionToNum.
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Context.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
To test:
1) Set "RenewalPeriodBase" syspref to "the current date",
"CircControl" to "the library the item is from." and
"HomeOrHoldingBranch" to "the item's home library (homebranch)."
2) Run tests in t/db_dependent/Circulation.t and verify
that fails (the script should actually crash before all
can be run).
3) Apply the patch
4) Verifiy that all tests now pass
Sponsored-by: Gothenburg University Library
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
A subest in t/db_dependent/Holds.t leaves behind database cruft.
Test Plan:
Using koha-testing-docker:
1) SELECT branchcode FROM branches
2) prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
3) SELECT branchcode FROM branches
Note cruft
4) reset_all
2) prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
3) SELECT branchcode FROM branches
No cruft!
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Resolves:
Use of uninitialized value $request_method in string eq at /usr/share/koha/C4/Auth.pm line 1122.
Use of uninitialized value $return in numeric gt (>) at /usr/share/koha/C4/Auth.pm line 1155.
We also remove the double logout from Auth.t
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Auth.t
Check if you do not see the warns anymore.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Comment speaks for itself. Look at surrounding code.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
Try t/db_dependent/Koha/Auth/TwoFactorAuth.t on cmd line.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
We need to replace 0 with 'disabled', and 1 with 'enabled'
Sponsored-by: Rijksmuseum, Netherlands
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch removes not required (for now) query parameters as we can
query using q= on those. They can be added back eventually, if needed.
Attributes now match the database as well.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch alters the code in the ES QueryBuilder. Reflecting
how things are handled in build_query_compat we clean the query,
but not the limits. In Zebra we simply recursivly call buildQuery,
but the ES query structure
This patchset adds a new ability to save searches on the staff client, and display them in the results
page on staff or opac as a new filter.
New filters can be added from the results page after a search, and there is an admin page for updating
deleting and renaming filters
There is a new permission to control management of these filters
New filters can be added that are not displayed along with facets, this allows for building custom links
using these filters to keep URLs shorter
Due to bug 30528 testing in ES is recommended
To test:
1 - Apply patches and update database and restart all
2 - Enable new system preference 'SavedSearchFilters'
3 - As superlibrarian perform a search in staff client, something broad like 'a'
4 - Note new 'Save search as filter' link on results page
5 - Click it, save search as new filter, check 'Staff client' visibility
6 - Perform another search
7 - Note the filter now appears above facets
8 - Click to it filter results
9 - Note results are limited by the new filter, and it is checked in the facets
10 - Confirm click the [x] removes the filter
11 - Go to administration->search filters
12 - Confirm the filter appears
13 - Edit and mark as OPAC visible
14 - Test OPAC to ensure it shows and can be applied/removed
15 - Copy URL with filter applied
16 - In adminsitration mark filter as not visible on staff or opac
17 - Confirm link above still works
18 - Create a new staff with catalogue and search filters permission
19 - Ensure they can access/save filters
20 - Remove filter permission and ensure they cannot
21 - Disable system preference
22 - Confirm links to search filters page are removed from admin home and admin sidebar
23 - Confirm filters do not appear on results and cannot be created
24 - Enable pref
25 - Create a filter
26 - From search filters page, click 'Edit search'
27 - Confirm you are taken to advanced search page letting you know which filter you are editing
28 - Confirm you can change searhc options and save
29 - Confirm you can perform the search from this page
Sponsored-by: Sponsored by: Round Rock Public Library [https://www.roundrocktexas.gov/departments/library/]
Signed-off-by: Michal Urban <michalurban177@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Sponsored-by: Sponsored by: Round Rock Public Library [https://www.roundrocktexas.gov/departments/library/]
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This adds the API routes and tests
Sponsored-by: Sponsored by: Round Rock Public Library [https://www.roundrocktexas.gov/departments/library/]
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
Run xt/find-missing-filters.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
It can be useful to know exactly what template was used to generate a notice. To this end, it would be useful to store the letter id as a foreign key in the message queue table.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Restart all the things!
4) Run an action that will send a notice to a patron
5) Note the letter id is now in the message_queue table for that notice!
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrewfh@dubcolib.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Verify CircControlReturnsBranch is set to home library by default
4) Set a Return policy for Branch A to "Item returns home" ( homebranch )
5) Set a Return polity for Branch B to "Item returns to issuing library" ( holdingbranch )
6) Set a Return polity for Branch C to "Item floats" ( noreturn )
7) Create an item with homebranch of Branch A, holding branch of branch B
8) Log in as Branch C
9) Set CircControlReturnsBranch to "the library the item is currently held by"
10) Check the item in, note it should be returned to the holding library
11) Set CircControlReturnsBranch to "the library the item is owned by"
12) Check the item in, note it should be returned to the home library
13) Set CircControlReturnsBranch to "the library you are logged in at"
14) Check the item in, note it should float
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrewfh@dubcolib.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This commit adds unit tests for Bug 14783.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
What this patch does:
- change the navigation bar style
- change the breadcrumbs style
- change the "last borrower" link style
- move the search bar inside the navigation bar
- move the help link to the same row as the breadcrumbs
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Bug 28730 added the ability to format due dates based on Koha's date format, but missed formatting the due date field in the item information response.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) prove t/db_dependent/SIP/Message.t
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Cab Vinton <director@plaistowlibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch changes holds' GET REST API endpoint permission
to place_holds to match with request.pl
Test plan:
1) prove t/db_dependent/api/v1/holds.t
Sponsored-by: Koha-Suomi Oy
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
In the subroutine ModDateLastSeen we unset an item's lost status when
checked in.
This routine passes a noi log parameter to the store request, this is
to avoid spamming the cataloguing log on every checkin.
When marking an item unlost we should record this change.
To test:
1 - Enable cataloguing log
2 - Mark an item lost
3 - View the log and confirm this chagne was recorded
4 - Check the item in
5 - The message indicates item is now found, but logs have no new entry
6 - Apply patch, restart all
7 - Mark the item lost and verify it is logged
8 - Check the item in, reported found and log entry recorded
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrewfh@dubcolib.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The question whether item is denied renewal doesn't depend on
circulation rules or the patron, it is only a property of the item and
only changes to the item's attributes can cause the return value of
the check to change, thus we should move this to be a method of
Koha::Item.
To test:
1) Run unit tests
$ prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Creates new test file GetBasketGroupAsCSV.t
Test with :
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/GetBasketAsCSV.t
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/GetBasketGroupAsCSV.t
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This unit test confirms that we are not triggering the Password Change
notification notice upon patron creations.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Disable password change notifications for the api test to negate the
need for setting up notices.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch moves tests to the right file (singular class name). It also
refactors them a bit, in order to cover more cases, including the
syspref split one.
To test:
1. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Patron/Category.t \
t/db_dependent/Koha/Patron/Categories.t
=> SUCCESS: All good.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
1. Run tests (Categories.t has been updated by me, and I suggest running
Suggestions.t to confirm it still passes):
sudo koha-shell kohadev
prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Patron/Categories.t
prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Suggestions.t
Sponsored-by: Catalyst IT, New Zealand
Signed-off-by: Rhonda Kuiper <rkuiper@roundrocktexas.gov>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
[1] NotifyPassowrdChange => NotifyPasswordChange
[2] Someone has changed your library user account password.
Scary? Changed it myself. Reworded it a bit.
[3] is( $THE_notice->status, 'failed', "The notice was sent immediately");
Note that THE_notice is imo horrible :) Wont touch it though.
But I think we should reword 'sent' since it just failed.
And we actually should mock sending mail here. Adding FIXME.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds a unit test to check that the notice is enqueued and
sending is attempted immediately.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds a unit test to the Auth_with_ldap.t to confirm welcome
notices are send when replace + welcome are enabled in the
configuration.
We also add a snippet to hide 'Subroutine redefined' warnings in this
test as it makes the test output rather challenging to read and the way
the test is written these warning are expected.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
See comment36 and comment37. This needs more attention but
serves as a quick fix only.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
No need to keep it.
Fixing a test description too.
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Context.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Sponsored-by: Lund University Library, Sweden
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
marc_subfield_structure.kohafield can be NULL, but it can also be an
empty string. But in that case, Koha::Item::as_marc_field ignores them,
which means the resulting MARC::Field object has missing data.
This can produce a bug in OPAC ISBD view (and probably other places
where this method is used)
Test plan:
1. Edit the default biblio MARC framework for the item field: find or
create a subfield that is not linked to a DB column.
Save even if you made no changes to make sure that
marc_subfield_structure.kohafield is set to an empty string.
I'll use 995$Z as an example for the following steps.
2. Add the following to syspref OPACISBD:
#995|<br>Item:|{995Z}|
3. Create a biblio with an item and put a value into 995$Z
4. Go to the ISBD detail page for this record at OPAC. Confirm that the
value you entered in 995$Z is not visible
5. Apply patch and restart koha
6. Refresh the ISBD detail page. Confirm that the 995$Z is now visible.
7. Run `prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t`
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Subtest for testing nullability of host, syntax and encoding.
Test plan:
Run prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Z3950Servers.t.
(Note: you need strict mode to pass this test.)
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
No real changes, just moving code and indentation.
Ground work for following patch.
Test plan:
To let the test pass, disable strict_mode in koha-conf.
Run perl t/db_dependent/Koha/Z3950Servers.t. Should pass now.
However, in strict mode or with prove, it should fail.
Run prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Z3950Servers.t. Failed?
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
When run under certain circumstances (in jenkins, for example) some ENV
variables are set for convenience, like PLACK_WORKERS and
PLACK_MAX_REQUESTS and is causing some tests to fail (notably, shib
ones).
This patch makes the regex only consider PLACK_ENV when testing for the
underscore case.
Tests are updated accordingly, and they are also rewritten to test for
boolean values instead of empty string, or zero or one, etc. The
implementation shouldn't matter as long as the boolean evaluation is
correct and it is clearer for devs what to expect.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
1. Run unit tests:
sudo koha-shell <instance>
cd t/db_dependent/Koha
prove -v Patron.t
Sponsored-by: Catalyst IT
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Previous commit correctly lists Zebra availability test, but was a
bad edit. This fixes the availability test to use itemlost
Additiionally, tests were written before limits were agreed. Adjusted
for the current settings
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
+ # Assume permission if context has no user
+ my $can_manage_background_jobs = 1;
=> This felt a bit unsafe.
Test plan:
Try interface for jobs. Call API with cookie. Call API with OAuth.
Run t/db_dependent/Koha/BackgroundJobs.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch makes the following changes to the 'background_jobs' API:
* We now call them 'jobs'
* Removed deprecated query parameter definitions
* Added only_current query parameter
* Controller gets adapted to use $rs->filter_by_current when
only_current is passed
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The following bugs refined permissions a bit, and the change was missing
on the tests:
* 23681
* 30335
Bonus: sorted permissions alphabetically for readability.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The test in question concerns non-superlibrarian staff users.
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
