Doing
$ git grep pickup_locations_code
shows there's some calculated data that is not actually used anywhere.
We can get rid of it.
This patch also reuses $item_object (which is in the same loop scope) to
avoid an extra DB call.
To test:
1. Run:
$ git grep pickup_locations_code
=> FAIL: It is only used/set as a comma separated string, inside
request.pl
2. Apply this patch
3. Repeat 1
=> SUCCESS: The unused stuff is not there anymore
4. Open the page for placing some holds
=> SUCCESS: It doesn't explode
5. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch makes the 'Any library' string translatable, by converting it
into a flag and using it accordingly on the request.tt template.
To test:
1. Have the 'Hold pickup library match' set to 'any library' on the
circultation rules.
2. Open the page to place a hold on a biblio with some items
=> SUCCESS: The item says 'Any library' on the 'Allowed pickup
locations' column.
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: No behavior change
=> SUCCESS: The string is on the template
5. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We should remove all SQL queries that contain 0000-00-00 and finally
assume we do not longer have such value in our DB (for date type)
We already dealt with such values in previous update DB entries.
The 2 added by this one haven't been replaced already.
The code will now assume that either a valid date exist, or NULL/undef.
Test plan:
QA review is needed and test of the different places where code is
modified.
Not sure about the change from reports/issues_avg_stats.pl
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Pretty much like the opac-reserve.pl does, this patch makes the staff
request.pl script get the branch from the specialized routine from
C4::Reserves instead of falling back to userenv.
To test:
1. Follow the original test plan:
- Create two local hold groups containing distinct lists of libraries.
- In default rules for all libraries, set Hold Policy = "From local hold group" and Hold pickup library match to "Patron's hold group"
- Make sure AllowHoldPolicyOverride is set to Don't Allow
- Make sure you're logged in at a library in Group 1
- Find a bib with only 1 item from Group 1. Confirm you can place a hold on this title for a patron in Group 1 (correct), but not for a patron in Group 2 (correct).
- Find a bib with only 1 item from Group 2. Confirm you cannot place a hold for a patron from Group 1 (correct), BUT you also cannot place a hold for a patron from Group 2 (incorrect) -- Koha gives the erroneous message "pickupNotInHoldGroup"
- Change your library to a something in Group 2
- Find a bib with only 1 item from Group 1. Confirm you cannot place a hold on this title for a patron in Group 1 (incorrect), and not for a patron in Group 2 (correct).
- Find a bib with only 1 item from Group 2. Confirm you cannot place a hold for a patron from Group 1 (correct), but you can place a hold for a patron from Group 2 (correct)
=> FAIL: Things expected to fail on the plan, fail.
2. Apply this patches
3. Repeat 1
=> SUCCESS: It now works!
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There is a missing parameter to CanItemBeReserved, we need to know if
the hold can be placed at a given pickup library.
Test plan:
1 - Set preferences:
UseBranchTransferLimits: enforce
BranchTransferLimitsType: itype
AllowHoldPolicyOverride: Don't allow
2 - Set Centerville 'Book' items to not be allowed to transfer to any other library
3 - Make sure Hold policy is set to 'any library'
4 - Find a record with a Centerville item and other items
5 - Attempt to place an item level hold on the Centerville item (with a
pickup library different than Centerville)
=> Without this patch you are taken to the holds list, but your hold is not placed
Nothing indicates why hold has failed
=> With this patch you cannot select the item from Centerville
"Cannot be transferred to pickup library"
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When no desk is defined request.pl returns an internal server
error. Check a desk is defined before asking for reservation deskname.
Plan test:
1. log in with a library with no desk
2. check in a reserved book so it'll be switch to “waiting reserve”
3. go to the book notice and click the Holds tab (request.pl page)
4. boum
5. apply patch, restart plack
6. refresh page
7. now loading properly
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When an item is checked in and marked 'Waiting' or already 'Waiting'
and there is a desk attached to the session, the item is marked
waiting at the current desk of the current library.
The information is displayed on the OPAC and on the intranet. The
patron can then know at which desk he can retrieve his document.
Desk Management (Bug 13881) is now useful.
Test plan :
1. apply Bug 24201
2. $KOHA_PATH/installer/data/mysql/updatedatabase.pl
3. Check out some document to someone
4. make another one reserve this document
5. check in the document
6. you can see the document is attach to the current library
7. create some desks and attach one to your session (see Bug 13881 and
Bug 24201)
8. cancel the preceding reserve and redo steps 3 to 5
9. you should see the document is waiting at the current library and
current desk on:
a. the intranet document request page
b. the intranet borrower holds tab
c. the item list where the document is listed on the bibliographic
details
d. the borrower's OPAC holds tab.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 24412: (follow-up) QA
Following Josef Moravec QA comments :
- rewrite Koha::Hold->desk according to Object Oriented Koha
Guidelines and use it to fetch desk name in various templates
- remove unused Desks.GetName
- Check for columns existence in db update
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 24412: (follow-up) QA: useless change
Maybe it was a relic of something usefull... anyway
not anymore.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 24412: (follow-up) Fix POD
Koha::Desk and not Koha::Library...
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This adds new syspref, HoldsNeedProcessingSIP, which controls whether
a hold that is related to item will be filled automatically or not. If
the user has enabled the syspref then instead of fulfilling the hold
automatically the hold will go to "in processing" state.
To test:
1. Checkout a book to patron A
2. Place a bib level hold to the book for B
3. Patron A returns the book via SIP, to simulate this use:
./misc/sip_cli_emulator.pl -su koha -sp koha -l CPL -a 127.0.0.1 -p 6001 --item <ItemBarcode> -m checkin
4. Notice that no notification is generated for Patron B about hold
and that the hold status in intranet and opac is "In Processing".
5. Notice that patron A (or other patrons) cannot checkout a book
that is in processing, because it is considered to be attached to
the holdee (similarly to the waiting state):
./misc/sip_cli_emulator.pl -su koha -sp koha -l CPL -a 127.0.0.1 -p 6001 --patron <PatronABarcode> --item <ItemBarcode> -m checkout
Signed-off-by: Timothy Alexis Vass <timothy_alexis.vass@ub.lu.se>
Rebased-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It defaults to 0 in get_template_and_user
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch
* sets one check for reserves and another for old_reserves in
atomic update
* Adds a message below the checkbox and adds detail when a hold is non
priority
* Fixes issue when there are more than one hold, but the first is non
priority
* Adds test case for this last scenario
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch implements necesary code to implement non priority feature
To test:
1) Apply all patches.
2) Run updatedatabase.
3) Checkout a specific item for patron1.
4) Place a hold on the same item for patron2 (do not check non priority
hold checkbox).
5) Try to renew the item for patron1.
CHECK => in checkouts table, there is a message that the item could not
be renewed because there was a hold.
6) Cleanup all checkouts and holds.
7) repeat steps 3 to 5, but this time check the non priority checkbox.
SUCCESS => item was renewed
8) prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisettes@latahlibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Some libraries would like to be able to cancel a hold with the option to
specify a reason. Providing a reason would generate an email to that
patron.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Restart all the things!
4) Create new AV category "HOLD_CANCELLATION", add some cancelation reasons
5) Add new Holds module notice "HOLD_CANCELLATION", add an email version.
A quick test version would be "Reason: <<reserves.cancellation_reason>>"
--
[% USE AuthorisedValues %]
Reason: [% AuthorisedValues.GetByCode( 'CANCELLATION_REASON', hold.cancellation_reason, 'IS_OPAC' ) %]
[% IF hold.cancellation_reason == "MY_AV_VALUE" %]
IF perhaps you'd like to have a much longer explanation than just the
one sentence in the AV description, you can use IF blocks using Template
Toolkit markup!
[% END %]
--
6) Place a hold for a patron
7) On request.pl, select the 'del' option for the hold
8) Select a cancellation reason and choose "Update hold(s)"
9) Note a new message has been queue for the patron with the cancelation reason
11) Test again from circulation.pl
12) Test again from moremember.pl
10) Cancel a hold with no reason, note no email is generated
11) Delete your authorised values, not the feature is disabled
12) Reinstate the authorised values, but delete the notice,
you should now be able to cancel a hold with a reason,
but no email will be generated
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Coert <rcoert@arlingtonva.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Naming mistake came because this sub is used to detect if anything
available for hold, but it used in "if ANY UNAVAILABLE rule", so actually
results of this sub negated (see below "return" in the code).
In details:
when previous refactor was done, name for subroutine was chosen
wrongly in "opposite" direction from what it actually does:
it was named "ItemsAnyAvailableForHold", but this subroutine gave
truth (1) if at least one of the items available on shelf, not lost,
not on loan, not held, and not restricted by smart rules and damaged
status. So, if this sub says that item is still "available", this
actually PREVENTS item from hold in parent sub (see negated return):
sub IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest {
...
my $any_available = ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted...
return $any_available ? 0 : 1;
# ^^^ if any available and not restricted - we don't allow
# on-shelf holds
...
I.e. like it named now: "ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted".
Small aside fix: white space for '&&' inside brackets added to join
operation by priority visually.
Testing plan not needed: all places where sub used it just renamed.
More: all this places/code was introduced in one older commit so there
is also no overlaps or other calls/uses for this subroutine.
Signed-off-by: Agustin Moyano <agustinmoyano@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Software error:
Can't call method "unblessed" on unblessed reference at ../reserve/request.pl line 581.
was caused by recent commit with `wantarray` removal in sub pickup_locations in ‘Item.pm’
and visible on fresher Perls (where experimental feature "autoderef" removed https://www.effectiveperlprogramming.com/2010/11/use-array-references-with-the-array-operators/ )
To test:
1) Get a clean dev environment after "reset_all"
2) Add an empty record for “Default checkout, hold and return policy” on /cgi-bin/koha/admin/smart-rules.pl.
3) Open item record, like /cgi-bin/koha/reserve/request.pl?biblionumber=1&borrowernumber=1
4) Observe the error (Can't call method "unblessed" on unblessed reference at ../reserve/request.pl line 581.)
5) Apply patch.
6) Repeat steps 2 and 3.
7) Observe that the error is gone.
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
There was a bug, on the biblio's hold list view, if the pickup library
was changed, the next screen was "place a hold for no title"
http://pro.kohadev.org/cgi-bin/koha/reserve/request.pl?multi_hold=1&biblionumbers=
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
If a hold is selected from the result list, we should let the ability to
select an item-level hold.
Test plan:
I. Detail page
1/ Go to a bibliographic record detail page
2/ Click "Place hold"
3/ Select a patron
=> No change expected, you can select an item
II. Search result, multiple holds
1/ Search for an item with more than one search result
2/ Select several items, click 'Place hold'
3/ Enter a patron card number
=> No change expected, item level holds are not available.
III. Search result, single hold
1/ Search for an item with more than one search result
2/ Select only one item, click 'Place hold'
3/ Enter a patron card number
=> With this patch applied, item level hold is available. The screen is the same
as when you place a hold from the bibliographic record detail page
=> Without this patch you cannot place an item-level hold
QA notes: We could go a bit further and remove the 2 biblionumbers and
biblionumber from hold script, as well as remove the checkMultiHold in
request.tt. We should not have a biblionumbers param that contain a list
of biblionumber separated by '/' but several biblionumber parameters
instead.
QA notes 2: About placerequest.pl, see bug 19618 comment 27.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
When "reserve/request.pl -> C4/Reserves.pm::IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest" called many times with hundred of items and "on shelf holds" parameter set to "If all unavailable" for these items + patron, it goes slow.
It happens because in subloop it is checking if all items available so it is O(n^2) and it re-checks each time the same info for each item with repeating DB/data requests.
Fix:
The inner loop 1:1 picked out into separate subroutine and called outside of the loop, saving data in 'items_any_available' variable once, this variable passed to IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest to be used inside as the precalculated result.
This made algorithm O(n) instead of O(n^2) so there is noticeable speed increase.
How to reproduce:
1) on freshly installed kohadevbox create/import one book,
remember that biblionumber for later use it in down below,
2) add 100 items for that book for some library,
3) find some patron, that patron's card number we will
use as a borrower down below to open holds page,
4) check for the rule or set up a single circulation rule
in admin "/cgi-bin/koha/admin/smart-rules.pl",
that rule should match above book items/library/patron,
check that rule to have a non-zero number of holds (total, daily, count) allowed,
and, IMPORTANT: set up "On shelf holds allowed" to "If all unavailable",
("item level holds" doesn't matter).
5) open "Home > Catalog > THAT_BOOK > Place a hold on THAT_BOOK" page
("holds" tab), and enter patron code in the search field,
or you can create a direct link by yourself, for example, in my case it was:
/cgi-bin/koha/reserve/request.pl?biblionumber=4&findborrower=23529000686353
6) it should be pretty long page generation time on old code, densely increasing for every hundred items added. In the case of this solution, it's fast, and time increases a little only, linear.
I tested on my computer in VirtualBox for page generation times,
did 3-5 runs for same case to check if results are stable, and got such values:
(old code):
100 items: 50 seconds
200 items: 3.2 minutes
300 items: 7.3 minutes
(version with fix):
100 items: 4.4 seconds
200 items: 7.5 seconds
300 items: 10.4 seconds
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
`$can_item_be_reserved eq 'OK'` moved in `&&` before `IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest`
to cut away with static known values before calling to more resource consuming subroutine.
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
On request.pl, the table of holds shows a suspend_until date picker for each hold, *unless* that hold is waiting or in transit. The script reserve/modrequest.pl assumes that there will be a suspend_until input for each hold, but that is incorrect. Assume there are 20 holds on a record, and 10 of them are waiting or in transit. If you were to then set the suspend until date on the 10 open holds, and use the "Update hold(s)" button, those 10 suspensions would apply to the 10 found holds and not the holds they should apply to!
Test Plan:
1) Place two holds on a record
2) Check in an item and trap it for the first hold
3) Now that one hold is waiting and the other is not, attempt to set
a suspension date using the "Update hold(s)" button
4) Note your hold does not get suspended!
5) Apply this patch
6) Restart all the things!
7) Repeat steps 1-3
8) Your hold should now be suspended!
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
The number of parameters of AddReserve makes it hard to read and
maintain.
This patch replace it with a hashref, which will make the calls more
readable.
Moreover the bibitems has been removed as it was not used by the
subroutine.
Test plan:
- Make sure the tests pass
- Read the diff and search for typos
- Place a hold on few items
Note for QA: reservation_date and expiration_date do not match the DB column's names,
should we?
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
The check to see if we can place a hold counts the number that we can override vs the number of items on the record.
We cannot override if we already have a hold on an item, however, we don't count these to see if they plus
the number of overrides equal the items on the record.
To test:
1 - Set max reserves to 2, allow 2 holds per recrod
2 - Place 2 holds for a patron on some records
3 - Find another record with 2 items
4 - Place a hold on the first item, you will be notified about the limit but you can override
5 - Attempt to place hold on second item, cannot be done, button disabled
6 - Apply patch
7 - Repeat
8 - You can place the second hold
Signed-off-by: Kelly McElligott <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch makes the following methods return array references of
Koha::Library objects instead or unblessed objects;
- Koha::Item->pickup_locations
- Koha::Biblio->pickup_locations
- Koha::Libraries->pickup_locations
Bonus:
- The template plugin is adjusted to unbless things to keep behavior
- Tests are moved to the right .t file.
- Tests for the new behavior are added.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds "patron's hold group" as a new option to Hold pickup library match
To test:
1. Set ReservesControlBranch preference to item.
2. Create a hold group
3. Go to circulation and fines rules
SUCCESS => in 'Hold pickup library match' there is a new option called "patron's hold group"
4. In a library not in hold group set 'Hold policy' to "any" and 'Hold pickup library match' to "patron's hold group"
5. Search for a user in the hold group
6. 'Search to hold' for items of the library of step 4
7. Select an item and 'Place hold for [user]'
SUCCESS => in 'Pickup at' you should see patron's hold group as options
8. In OPAC sign in as the same user of step 5
9. Search for the item in step 7
SUCCESS => in 'Pick up locations' you should see patron's hold group as options
10. Sign off
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds a new message to 'Hold' column in 'Place a hold on a specific item' table.
The message is "Cannot place hold from patrons's library". It appears when patron's homebranch is not in item's hold group, and hold_fulfillment_policy is set to 'holdgroup'.
This patch also adds a new column "Allowed pickup locations" that lists allowed pickup locations per item.
Finally, the select that displays pickup locations is filtered by allowed pickup locations, when multi_hold is not enabled
To test:
1) Apply this patch
2) In library groups add a root group and check it as hold group.
3) Add two libraries to the group
4) In circulation and fines rules, in 'Default checkout, hold and return policy', in Hold policy change the value to 'From local hold group'
5) Search a patron from a different library than step 3, select one and click 'search to hold'
6) Search by location for items in any library of step 3
7) On any item, clic on 'Place hold for ...'
SUCCESS => when the page is loaded, in the 'Place a hold on a specific item', you should see the message "Cannot place hold from patrons's library" in 'Hold' column
=> You should see a new column called "Allowed pickup locations" and the message is "Any library"
8) In circulation and fines rules, in 'Default checkout, hold and return policy', in 'Hold policy' change the value again to 'From any library' and change 'Hold pickup library match' to "Item's hold group"
8) Repeat steps 5 to 7
SUCCESS => when the page is loaded, you should see the "Pickup at" select filtered by libraries in hold group
=> You should see in "Allowed pickup locations" a coma separated list of the libraries in item's hold group
=> If biblio has an item whose control branch is not in a hold group, you should see the control branch name in "Allowed pickup locations"
9) Sign off
Sponsored-by: VOKAL
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch actually fixes the issue described on bug 23116.
Test plan:
See bug 23116 and comment 5. Important to note that the later comparison with
itemAlreadyOnHold assumes that the variable is a string.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test plan:
1. Place some holds
2. Go to the 'Holds' tab of the biblio record
3. Modify dates in the table and click on 'Update holds' button
4. Verify that dates have been correctly updated
Signed-off-by: Maryse Simard <maryse.simard@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds the ability to place a hold for each member of a club in random order.
To test:
1) apply this patch
2) create 2 clubs, (club names should have some part in common, and some part different for each other)
3) in one of them add at least 6 members
4) enter patron clubs management and click on "Actions" button
SUCCESS.1 => club with members has a new action called "search to hold"
5) click on search to hold
SUCCESS.2 => in the list of bilios there appears an action called "Place hold for <club name>"
6) click on "Place hold for <club name>"
SUCCESS.3 => a new window appears where you can select pickup location (defaults to club's library, if any), and the list of members.
7) go back to the list of bilios in the catalog and click on "Forget <club name>"
8) click on "Holds" action of any biblio
SUCCESS.4 => a search box appears with two tabs: Patrons and Clubs
9) click on Clubs tab and search by the common part of clubs names
SUCCESS.5 => a list of clubs that matches the search appears. If you click on any of them, the same page as SUCCESS.3 appears.
10) go back to the search box in SUCCESS.4 and search by the different part of the name.
SUCCESS.6 => because there is only one club that matches search criteria, the same page as SUCCESS.3 appears;
11) Sign off
Sponsored-by: Southeast Kansas Library - SEKLS
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Unify and clean up subtitle usage so that it's always used as a simple array and not the old hash structure.
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch is a bit of a clean-up to bring the item status display
more in line with the display on the detail page:
- show descrpition of authorised value for not for loan instead of hardcoded text
- Show description of authorised value for lost instead of hardcoded text
This is also a translatability fix, as the text came from the .pl
- Show description of authorised value damaged instead of hardcoded text
- Make sequence of status match display on details page:
lost - damaged - not for loan
To test:
- On a record with multiple items
- Add different status to the items
damaged, lost, not for loan
- Make sure you have items with one status and multiple status at the same time
- Look at how the status display on the detail page
- Place a hold, compare display
- Apply patch
- Repeat
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
A library appears to be able to place a second item level hold on an item a patron already has on hold if
A) AllowHoldPolicyOverride is enabled
and
B) the circ rule allow for multple item level holds.
Once the patron submits the hold requests though, the hold does not get stored in the database.
Because allowing two item level holds for the same item makes no sense, we should not allow
this attempt to take place, even if AllowHoldPolicyOverride is enabled.
Test Plan:
1) Enable AllowHoldPolicyOverride
2) Set up circ rules to allow for multiple item level holds on one record
3) Place an item level hold on a record
4) Note you can force placing a second item hold on that reocrd
5) Attempt to do so, it will not actually work
6) Apply this patch
7) Note you can no longer place another item level hold for the same item
you just placed an item-level hold on
8) Note you can still force holds that contravene the circ rules for
any and all other reasons
9) Test with record level holds
10) Test by placing multiple holds from search results
Signed-off-by: Martha Fuerst <mfurest@hmcpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Simple fix for a regression. Works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Almost everywhere we call IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest we already have
a Koha::Patron and Koha::Item object. It makes sense to use them to
avoid a refetch
Test plan:
It would be good to test this patch on top of 19300 and 19301 and make
sure everything works as expected
Signed-off-by: Hayley Mapley <hayleymapley@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Line from 16.11 log:
Use of uninitialized value within @itemnumber in string ne at /usr/share/koha/prodclone/reserve/modrequest.pl line 70.
Test plan:
Read the change. Not 100% identical (numeric zero) but should be enough.
This line is probably not needed at all.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Test plan:
1) Enable the CheckPrevCheckout and DisplayMultiPlaceHold system preferences
2) Have a patron with some checkouts history
3) Try to place hold on one of titles from history for this patron
4) You should see an information at the top of confirm request page, but
you still should be able to place a hold
5) Try this with multiple titles - one or more of them should be from
history
6) You should see this information in "Information" column
7) There is also new column placed at the beggining with checkbox, you
could uncheck it for titles you do not want to place a hold on it
8) Confirm the hold is placed only on checked titles
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Bin Wen <bin.wen@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch corrects a missing id on the holds_to_place field and adds code to disable the box when an item is checked
Additionally script login now places a single hold if an itemnumebr is passed and checks for holdability of the specific item
To test:
1 - Allow multiple holds per record in circ rules
2 - In staff client, go to place a hold on a record
3 - Select a patron
4 - Increase the number of holds
5 - Then select a specific item to hold
6 - Patron now has multiple holds on a single item
7 - Apply patch
8 - Repeat, notice that count is disabled when item checked
9 - Confirm count is enabled when 'Hold next available item' is checked
10 - Set number to more than 1
11 - Check an item and submit
12 - Confirm only one item is reserved
13 - Hit the script directly (with valid info):
http://localhost:8081/cgi-bin/koha/reserve/placerequest.pl?biblionumber=1&checkitem=1&holds_to_place_count=2&borrowernumber=5
14 - Confirm only one hold is placed
15 - Confirm multiple hits of the url do not generate further holds
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
1 - Set an All/All/All rule with reserves limited 2 to
2 - Search in the staff side
3 - Select all records (or more than 2) from the results
4 - Click 'Place hold'
5 - Find a patron, place holds
6 - You get more holds than you should
7 - Delete those holds
8 - Apply patch
9 - Search and select more than 2 records
10 - Find patron, place holds
11 - Only 2 holds are placed
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Branch transfer limits are respected for placing holds in the OPAC but nowhere else. This should be remedied.
Test Plan:
1) Set up a branch transfer limit from Library A to Library B
2) Verify you cannot set up a hold for an item from Library A for pickup at Library B from the staff interface ( without overriding )
3) Verify you cannot place that hold via ILS-DI
4) Verify you cannot place that hold via SIP
4) Verify a forced hold from Library A to Library B will not show up in the holds queue
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Note: This is here for information purpose, feel free to test it if you
wan to play with it.
TODO: C4::Reserves::_get_itype is not longer in use
No more GetItem must be returned by:
git grep GetItem|grep -v GetItemsAvailableToFillHoldRequestsForBib|grep
-v GetItemsForInventory|grep -v GetItemsInfo|grep -v
GetItemsLocationInfo|grep -v GetItemsInCollection|grep -v
GetItemCourseReservesInfo|grep -v GetItemnumbersFromOrder|grep -v
GetItemSearchField|grep -v GetItemTypesCategorized|grep -v
GetItemNumbersFromImportBatch|cut -d':' -f1|sort|uniq
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
The changes caused by the patches for bug 11512 have broken existing
workflows for many libraries and are widely considered to be a bad move.
We should revert this behavior.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Rhonda Kuiper <kuiper@roundrocktexas.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch disables the dropdown for found holds, and adds a new button
to revert the waiting status, setting the hold to priority 1
Additionally we remove some changes from 19469 and update the JS to skip
found holds when updating priority
To test:
1 - Find a record with multiple items
2 - Place 4 holds (or more)
3 - Capture one ohld as waiting, one as in transit
4 - View the holds on the record - switch the last to priority one
5 - Waiting and transit statuses get confused
6 - Apply patch
7 - Observe dropdown is now disabled for waiting holds
8 - Confirm other holds operate as expected
9 - Confirm 'Revert found status' resets hold
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 21608: (follow-up) Use RevertWaitingStatus and do not alter _FixPriority
[EDIT]
Completely removed the changes to Reserves.pm by adding module prefix in
the request.pl script.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
