If all results are hidden, the facets are displayed.
With this patch, the facets are hidden too.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michot <nmichot@voila.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests and QA script. Tested:
- Record with 1 lost item, result list = 1
- Verified without both patches 404 error page is shown
- Verified with 1st patch, no results page is shown
- Verified with 2nd patch, the still showing facets are gone
- Record with 1 lost item, result list > 1
- Record is hidden from result list, but
- result count is wrong
- result numbering is wrong
> This is an old problem, just noting
- Record with 1 lost and 1 available item, result list = 1
- Detail page is shown, only lost item is hidden
- Record with 1 lost and 1 available item, result list > 1
- Only available item is shown in result list
Also checked that the lost item shows up with hidelostitems off.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
If hidelostitems is enabled, and the result of an opac search is a single
lost item, then the OPAC will display a 404 error, rather than a
"no results" screen.
Test Plan:
1) Catalog a record/item such that it is the only result for some search
e.g. Give it the title 'zxcvb'
2) Enable hidelostitems
3) Mark this item as lost
4) Perform an OPAC search that should result in a redirect to this record
5) Notice you a redirected to a 404 error
6) Apply this patch
7) Repeat step 4
8) Note you new get a "No results found!" page instead
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Michot <nmichot@voila.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch teaches the ordering receiving process how to
set vendor and internal order notes.
One observation: I'm not sure it's entirely useful to set
a note to communicate to the vendor during receiving --
how is it to be sent to them, and why?
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This followup answer QA remarks :
- neworderempty.pl updated so that the 2 new variables are passed
to the template
- modordernotes.tt fixed to make the translation easier
- in CSV headers, to make clear that no change are made for the moment,
rename "note" to "internal note"
Additionnaly, "Publisher code" was wrong in the csv headers. I changed
it to "Publisher" (the field in database is publishercode, but the
content is a real publisher name, not a code)
I did not change "Note:" in modordernotes.tt, because it is just under
a h1 tag which specifies the type of note the librarian is editing.
Test plan :
- edit an existing order, and try to change/add/delete the vendor note,
and the internal note. Check the changes are properly saved
- export a basket and a basketgroup in CSV. Check the columns headers
are "Publisher" and "Vendor note"
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Fixed some tabs. Passes QA script and tests.
Tested:
- add notes when creating an order
- edit notes modifying an order line
- edit notes using the links on the basket summary
- check basket CSV export
- close basket
- check basket group CSV export
- edit notes on order receive page using the links
- edit notes on receive
Note: Translatability of templates could be improved by a follow-up.
It's better not to divide up sentences with if/else structures.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch fixes UT, to take into account the new fields
order_internalnote and order_vendornote.
Note that "notes" field is still returned as well by some
acquisition subs (those which return all the fields of biblio
and biblioitems table)
Test plan :
run prove t/db_dependant/Acquisition.t
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Currently, there is a single note field in each order. It would be
useful to have 2 notes fields:
- one for the staff (ex: "catalog this book as soon as possible")
- one for the vendor (ex: "urgent", "only the 2d volume"...), which
could later be printed in basketgroup pdf for example
This patch adds a new note made for vendor in each order. The existing
note is renamed "internal note".
The behavior of the 2 notes are the same
Changes in database structure:
- new column aqorders.order_vendornote
- column aqorders.notes renamed aqorders.order_internalnote
To test :
[1] Make a complete acquisiton process (creating the order > looking at
the basket > looking the order > receiving); and try to use the 2
notes (internal note / vendor note)
[2] Check the changes made on one page (eg detail of the order) are
saved and visible on an other page (eg receipt page)
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Testing notes on last patch.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/Invoices.t
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/OrderFromSubscription.t
all should return green.
NOTE: Any error messages are the same between master and this
patch, and are unrelated to the added/revised tests.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Revised test plan:
1/ Create an order with 2 items
2/ Receive 1 item and enter a note for the order
3/ Verify the note is not saved
The note should be visible on the Mod Order Details screen,
but it isn't there.
4/ Apply patch
5/ Receive the second item and enter a note for the order
6/ Verify the note is correctly saved
The note is visible on the Mod Order Details screen.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests and QA script.
Works as described. The note now saves correctly and also remains when
you undo a receipt.
Note: it would be nice to show the note on the receive page as well.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
When using QueryWeightFields to add ranking on a search without index,
the search actually uses:
- rank 1 : Title-cover,ext : exact title-cover
- rank 2 : ti,ext : exact title
- rank 3 : Title-cover,phr : phrase title-cover
- rank >7 : queries without index
This relevance sets title as phrase in priority and then any index.
This patch adds title as words list before search on any index, so
that records with all searched terms in title, even not well ordered,
are more relevant.
Test plan :
- Enable QueryWeightFields syspref
- Perform a search, with sort by relevance, with two words ofen
contained in title, but never one near the other.
For example: 'History France'
=> Records with both words in title are first. For example:
"Histoire de France" and "La France : 100 ans d'histoire"
Signed-off-by: Jesse Maseto <jesse@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Relevance ranking and field weighting are hard to test,
as many MARC fields are indexed into the used indexes.
If we had an index that only indexed 245$a/200$a the
effect might be more visible.
I found no regressions by this patch, change reads
logical.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch replaces occurrences of CGI::scrolling_list with
untranslatable labels. It also fixes capitalization.
To test
1. Go to Administration > Authority types,
click 'MARC structure' of any auth type,
click 'subfields' for any Tag >= 010,
clic 'Edit subfields'
Check pulldowns 'Managed in tab' and 'Select to display or not'
2. Apply the patch
3. Reload and verify functionality of both pulldowns
4. Check that strings are not present on staff PO file
egrep "^msgid \"(Show all|Hide all|ignore)" misc/translator/po/fi-FI-i-staff-t-prog-v-3006000.po
5. Update language file
(cd misc/translator/; perl translate update fi-FI)
6. Check that strings are now present, repeat 4.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
NOTE: drop-downs work identically. Show all, Hide all, and
ignore were added to the po files too.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests and QA script.
Works as described and improves the page to manage authority
subfields.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
The SQL column headers is stored into the columns.def file.
This file is not managed by the translation script.
This patch makes possible the headers translation.
Note: The translation xml tags were added to avoid all lines being put
on a single line.
Test plan:
1/ update your po file
cd misc/translate;
perl translate -f columns update LANG # Replace by another language here
2/ translate header columns (search "columns.def" in your po file).
3/ install the translated columns.def
perl translate -f columns install LANG # Replace by another language here
4/ go on the report module > create a new report > next > next
5/ change the language
on the 3rd step, you should see the column header translated.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Work as described, no koha-qa errors
[on es-ES about a third of the strings translated!! :-) ]
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described and fixes a long standing translation
problem.
Passes all tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
The 'notes' column has been removed from the pending holds and hold
ratios reports as they were not displaying in the first place.
1.apply patch
2.verify that both reports work
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
When searching with a sort (means not by relevance) and there is an error
in Zebra connexion (server is down or query is wrong), you get the message :
Error : Can't call method "sort" on an undefined value at /home/kohaadmin/src/C4/Search.pm line 405.
This patch corrects by not performing sort if there are no no results.
Steps to reproduce the error without patch:
In OPAC go to Advanced Search
Choose "Title" in first "Search for:" end enter "ccl=( and )"
Display "More options"
Set "Sort by" to "Title (A-Z)"
Click "Search" at bootom of page
Result:
Error:
Can't call method "sort" on an undefined value at /usr/share/kohaclone/C4/Search.pm line 430.
After applying the patch, try that search again. This time,
it should report not results found with out the error message.
Alternative Test plan :
- Set OPACdefaultSortField on something else than relevance
- Perform a simple search with a wrong CCL query. For example : ccl=( and )
=> You get the messge : No results found ...
Patch behaves as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Adds another check to prevent a bad Zebra error message.
Works as described, passes all tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch adds a regression test for the condition noted
in bug 9578, where attempting a sort of a Zebra search that
fails because of an invalid query crashes.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Follow-up to fix similar issue on vendor edit.
If the tax rates in Acquisitions -> gist system preference
are entered with trailing zeroes, given vendor tax rate value
may not be correctly handled on vendor edit.
Test plan for this follow-up:
1) insert some tax rates with trailing zeroes in gist
system preference (e.g: '0|0.080|0.12|0.20|0.23')
2) add some vendors, choosing 8.0% 12.0% 20.0% 23.0%
as gst rate
3) try to modify them
4) note that vendors with 12.0% and 23.0% tax rates are
preserving previously choosen rates on edit, while
the ones with 8.0% and 20.0% do not (they are defaulting
to the first defined tax rate)
5) apply the patch
6) repeat 2) and 3)
7) all tax rates configured in system prefrence shall now
behave properly while editing vendors
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
If the tax rates in Acquisitions -> gist system preference are entered
with trailing zeroes, given order tax rate value may not be correctly
handled on order edit.
To test:
1) insert some tax rates with trailing zeroes in gist
system preference (e.g: '0|0.080|0.12|0.20|0.23')
2) place some new orders, choosing 8.0% 12.0% 20.0% 23.0%
as gst rate
3) try to modify them
4) note that orders with 12.0% and 23.0% tax rates are
preserving previously choosen rates on edit, while
the ones with 8.0% and 20.0% do not (they are defaulting
to the first defined tax rate)
5) apply the patch
6) repeat 2) and 3)
7) all tax rates configured in system prefrence shall now
behave properly while editing orders
Signed-off-by: Nicole C. Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
All tests pass
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Confirmed the problem and that this patch fixes it.
Problem also exists for editing the default tax rate of a vendor.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
On ordered.pl and spent.pl, the itemtype codes are displayed, instead of
descriptions.
Links for the ordernumber should be changed. In ordered.pl, we are
redirected to the receive page. In spent.pl, the links are deleted.
Signed-off-by: Broust <jean-manuel.broust@gmail.com>
Revisited patch: The link to orderreceive was broken, so I undo the
changes.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works alright, itemtype descriptions are shown.
The removed link was potentially 'dangerous' as you shouldn't
get to the receive page for an order, without providing an invoicenumber
first.
Passes all tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
When order is being created from purchase suggestion:
- Budget/fund stored in suggestion record (if any) is not retained
on order page, system always defaults to 'Select a fund' even if some
fund was already chosen for a suggestion on the earlier stage.
- If there was a price given to, and stored within suggestion record,
initial prices calculations on order page are not working properly
('Replacement cost', 'Budgeted cost' and 'Total' show as 0.00 or blank).
As a workaround - to force correct price recalculation - user needs
to manually alter and then re-alter some price-related fields (e.g.,
quantity or vendor price).
This patch fixes both issues.
Test plan:
1) create a suggestion: choose some buget, enter something in 'Price'
and 'Quantity' fields,
2) try to make an order from this suggestion, to confirm/replicate
aforementioned problems,
3) apply patch,
4) make an order from previously created suggestion again, observe
that both issues are now resolved.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, passes all tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Add test cases to exercise output_pref's as_due_date option
when the time in question is not one minute before midnight.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This parameter is a boolean, if true, the hours won't be displayed if
the time is 23:59 (24hr format) or 11:59 PM (12hr format).
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
There are 2 useless routines in the Koha::DateUtils
module:output_pref_due and format_sqlduedatetime. We can call
output_pref and format_datetime with dateonly = 0.
format_sqlduedatetime is only used in one place: opac-reserve.pl
Test plan:
1/ Verify on the opac-reserve.pl page that the date is correctly
displayed for for onloan items (you should use the "specific copy"
feature).
2/ Launch prove t/DateUtils.t UT file and verify all UT pass.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Due date on opac-reserve shown correctly. Unit tests pass.
Did a grep on both function names.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
No references to subs found. Passes koha-qa.pl, t and xt
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
In serials/serials-edit.pl, if an item field is hidden from the OPAC,
it will not display in the editor, even if the field is marked as
visible in the staff intranet and editor. However, the field is still
displayed correctly in the items editor ( additem.pl ).:
Test Plan:
1) Select an item-level field ( e.g. non-public note )
2) Create a serial using the default framework ( or one of your choice )
3) For that framework, mark the chosen field as visible from the
intranet and editor, but not the opac.
4) Receive an item for this serial, note your field does not display
5) Use the biblio item editor to add an item ( additem.pl ), not the
field displayes
6) Apply this patch
7) Repeat step 4, not the field displayes
Signed-off-by: Kim Schwant <kim.schwant@courts.in.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
PrepareItemrecordDisplay is only used for editor (-4 < hidden < 4)
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This fixes bootstrap and prog by modifying the description displayed
in the OPAC's detail of serials.
RM NOTE: this patch does not cover the case where custom serial
frequencies have been defined.
TESTING to reproduce
- create/find a serial with a 1/week periodicity (4 in the database)
- Find it in the opac-detail.pl, click "more details" at the bottom
- validate the string. Before the patch, it will say:
"The current subscription began on 2013-12-06 and is issued every 3
weeks for 26 issues"
The "every 3 weeks" is clearly wrong.
In fact any periodicity chosen would display a wrong description, not
matching the staff interface.
After the patch, the display is corrected.
As a bonus, the "every 2 years" now has a description, where it had
none before.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Bug 10851 introduced new missing status (codes 41,42,43,44), but in
GetSerials and _update_missinglist, they are not taken into account.
This patch corrects the issue.
To reproduce:
1/ Create a serial with 10 issues.
2/ Set different statuses on each one, with at least 6 missing statuses
(not only "Missing").
3/ Go on the subscription detail page, tab "Summary", the issues with a
new missing status are not listed in the missing issues list.
4/ On the "Issues" tab, all missing are listed (normally only 5 should
be listed.
5/ Apply the patch.
6/ Edit serial (to rewrite the missing list).
6/ Verify that steps 3 and 4 have now correct behavior.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, passes QA script and tests.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Show 'Unknown' when planneddate and publisheddate cannot be calculated
Also fixes SQL query in misc/cronjobs/serialsUpdate.pl that was still
using "periodicity != 32" to exclude irregular subscriptions from
results
Test plan:
1) Create a subscription in the serials module. Make sure to choose:
Frequency = Irregular
2) Test the prediction pattern, first publication date is set to
"First issue publication date" field, others will show as
'unknown'
3) Save the subscription
4) Check the created issue - it will show a published date and a
planned date (same as "First issue publication date" field)
5) Receive the issue and check the next generated issue, planned
date and published date should show as 'Unknown'
6) Generate a next issue, planned date and published date should
also show as 'Unknown'
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Work as described following test plan.
No koha-qa errors
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests and QA script.
Also tested:
- multi receiving generates mulitple issues without dates - 'unknown'
- staff detail page shows the dates empty, which is fine
- OPAC detail page shows the dates empty, which is fine
- serial collection page shows 'unknown' and those issues appear
on the 'manage' tab, as they did in the past
- Editing the issue from the serial collection page leaves the
date fields empty.
- Receving the issue, setting the status to 'Arrived' the Expected on
date is set to 'today' automatically. Date published has to be
entered manually (maybe something we could improve later
- subscription detail > issues tab shows Uknown.
- t/db_dependent/Serials/GetNextDate.t pass.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch puts C4::Serials::can_show_subscription() into use.
Note that there is user-visible change: if a subscription has a
blank library, all users with serials permissions will be able
to view and/or edit it. It remains to be determined whether
we *want* such subscriptions to exist, or if they should only
be tied to specific libraries.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Tested on top of patches for 12048 and 12080.
Subscription search
- superlibrarian, IndyBranches on/off - always sees all subscriptions
- superserials, IndyBranches on/off - always sees all subscriptions
- no superserials, IndyBranches on - only sees own subscriptions
Note: Subscriptions without branches will only show, when all subscriptions
are visible. In a future enh it might be good to enforce setting a
branch, when IndyBranches is used.
- no superserials, IndyBranches off - always sees all subscriptions
Subscription editing
- superlibrarian, IndyBranches on/off - can edit all subscriptions
- superserials, IndyBranches on/off - can edit all subscriptions
- no superserials, IndyBranches on - can only edit own subscriptons and
subscriptions without branch
NOTE: it would make sense to also allow Edit > Edit as new (duplicate)
here, so one can copy the subscription from another branch to modify
it for the own branch.
Passes tests in t, xt and QA script, also newly provided unit tests.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch fixes a problem whereby staff users could
edit subscriptions they are not permitted to by going directly
to the subscription details page.
It also adds some unit tests for the can_edit_subscription routine
and add a new can_show_subscription routines.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Notes on second patch.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
The superserials permission is meant to allow an operator
to see all subscriptions regardless of branch when IndependentBranches
is on without having to have full superlibrarian permissions. This
patch restores this behavior.
TEST PLAN
---------
1) Apply the patch for bug 12048 (as needed -- it may be pushed)
2) Ensure you have two users: superlibrarian, non-superlibrarian
with all access to the staff client except superserials.
3) Ensure you have serials belonging to a different branch than
the non-superlibrarian.
3) Log into staff client as superlibrarian
4) Click 'Serials'
5) Click the 'Submit' button in the search area.
-- note the number of results.
6) Log into staff client as non-superlibrarian
7) Click 'Serials'
8) Click the 'Submit' button in the search area.
-- note the number should be less, note the number.
9) Give the non-superlibrarian superserials access.
10) Home -> Serials
11) Click the 'Submit' button in the search area.
-- the number will still be the same at the one in step #8.
12) Apply the patch
13) Refresh the page
-- the number should now match the one in step #5.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch fixes a regression in master and 3.14. When a user has
superlibrian permissions, a search on serials subscriptions should
display other libraries' subscriptions even when IndependentBranches
syspref is enabled.
To reproduce/test the bug/patch:
1. Enable IndependentBranches (i.e. 'Prevent' staff...)
2. Login as a user not having superlibrarian permission
3. Search for a serial subscription on:
/cgi-bin/koha/serials/serials-search.pl
4. Search a title which has at least 2 subscriptions: one in the user
branch, and one in another branch
5. On the result page, just 1 subscription is displayed: the one
attached to the userbranch
=> this is normal
6. Login as a user having superlibrarian permission
7. Repeat step 3-5.
8. You get the same result as 5. You should have seen all subscriptions.
That's what you get after applying this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
NOTE: I tested a variation. My superlibrarian was a branch that
was not the same as the non-superlibrarian. The serial was
the same branch as the non-superlibrarian. Without the
patch, the superlibrarian saw nothing, with the patch it
saw the serial as expected.
Also, remember the superserials permission can affect the
results. I successfully changed the branch of the
subscription, and then it ceased to show up with
superserials not granted to the non-superlibrarian.
I corrected the system preference name in the text here.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Superlibrarian permission now allows to see all subscriptions
independent from the branch.
Passes all tests and QA script.
But the superserials permission appears broken to me before
and after this patch. If I have superserials - the search
doesn't show all subscriptions. If I don't have superserials
I can still edit any subscription accessing the subscription
detail page through the serial collection page or accessing
the detail page directly by manipulating the URL.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch adds a regression test for verifying that superlibrarians
can see all subscription when IndependentBranches is on.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch moves JavaScript functions used for managing basket groups
to a file. This has the effect of putting the last (active) use of
the YUI JavaScript library by the staff interface in one file:
koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/en/js/basketgroup.js
Test plan:
- Try all actions for basketgroup ( drag/drop, add, delete, close, print,
reopen, edit, export as csv).
- Check that there is no regression on others acquisition pages:
* acqui/neworderempty.tt
* acqui/uncertainprice.tt
* acqui/addorderiso2709.tt
* acqui/basketheader.tt
* admin/aqbudgets.tt
* admin/aqcontract.tt
* admin/aqbudgetperiods.tt
* admin/aqplan.tt
* suggestion/suggestion.tt
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, passes all tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch removes spaces in indicators which are imported when we link an
authority to a biblio record. The spaces made the indicators harder to edit
after the linking, because we had to delete the superfluous space character
before a new value could be entered.
To test:
1. Open some authority on editor, save with empty indicators.
They are saved as ind1=" " ind2=" " on auth_header tables, with spaces
2. Edit some record, link some tag with previous auth,
indicators now have a space on it (or ind1 at last)
3. Apply the patch
4. repeat 2, space is gone
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Work as described. No koha-qa errors.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch fixes two problems with the generation of
links to execute a Z39.50 search from the staff client
catalog and cataloguing search results page.
First, if using URI::Escape 3.30 or earlier, performing a simple search
with a double quote (e.g., "histoire algerie"), the Javascript is broken
in results page because of :
function GetZ3950Terms(){
var strQuery="&frameworkcode=";
strQuery += "&" + "title" + "=" + ""histoire%20algerie"";
Second, the encoding of non-ASCII characters in the search
term was broken.
This patch moves URI escaping from Perl to template with uri TT filter.
Test plan :
- To reproduce the issue with double quotes, the server
must be running URI::Escape 3.30 or earlier; the current
version of URI::Escape properly escapes double quote.
- In staff interface, perform a search with double quotes
that will return no result, ie "aaa xxx"
=> Without patch, javascript is broken
=> With patch, javascript is not broken
- Click on Z3950 button on results page
=> Without patch, the Title input is empty
=> With patch, the Title input contains the search terms
Additional test:
Do a search with something like äöü and then click Z3950
button on results page.
Without patch, encoding is broken in Z3950 form
With patch, encoding is correct.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Fixed a few tabs. Passes tests and QA script.
I can't reproduce the Javascript problem, but I can reproduce
the Z39.50 encoding problem and can detect no regression.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch fixes a problem where the holds queue generator
was making requests where the pickup library is the
same as the item's library but not the patron's branch,
even if there is a "Default holds policy by item type" rule that states
this item can only fill holds for patrons of the same library as the
item.
Test Plan:
1) Create a test record with 2 items with different itemtypes
2) Set the Default holds policy by item type for the first
item to "From any library"
3) Set the Default holds policy by item type for the second
item to "From home library"
4) Place a record level hold for a patron from another library,
but for pickup at the same library as the item is from
5) Rebuild the holds queue
6) View the holds queue, note the item is listed, though this
patron cannot place a hold on this item
7) Apply this patch
8) Repeat step 5, note the hold is no longer in the queue
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <liz@catalyst.net.nz>
automated tests pass, functional tests pass. Bug replicated, eradicated by patch.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
I finally managed to reproduce this, patch works as described.
Passes tests and QA script, provided tests fail without patch, but
succeed with the patch.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch modifies the patron summary printout so that
only fines with an outstanding balance (either positive
or negative) are displayed. Also, the entire fines section
is displayed only if there is a non-zero balance.
This is consistent with the logic for displaying the loans
and hold requests tables, and avoids cluttering the summary
with historical fines.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
