The syspref NewItemsDefaultLocation is used to set a default value for item's location.
But it seems that there are some weirdness in the behaviour:
1. It's only used from additem. It seems that it should be used from acq and serial modules as well. And maybe for the items import too.
2. It set the location even if another one has been picked from the UI
=> We UI must preselect the syspref's value, but the controller must pick what has been selected on the UI
This patch is adding the default to the UI and extend the use of the
pref to other areas.
Test plan:
Set a value to NewItemsDefaultLocation
Catalogue a new item and confirm that the syspref's value is picked to
selected the default value on the add item form
Same behaviour should apply to the acquisition and serial modules
When importing items, the default location must be used if the imported
items did not have a location defined.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch removes a hold from holds queue when captured by check in.
To test:
1. check out an item from a book with multiple items for patron_1
2. place a biblio level hold for patron_2
3. perl misc/cronjobs/holds/build_holds_queue.pl
CHECK => holds queue shows the placed hold
4. check in the item from step 1 and confirm hold for patron_2
SUCCESS => hold for patron_2 is no longer in holds queue
5. prove t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest the check is for holdability and in
ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted the check is for
checkoutability. These comments should make it more clear because the
notforloan value is used for these two different purposes and is a bit
confusing (we might want to add a new field "notforhold" in future to
make the code self documenting)
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted function is checking whether an
item can be checked out and it incorrectly only checks the positive
notforloan values when there can be also negative notforloan
values. If notforloan value is not 0 then it means the item cannot be
checked out. In the case of ordered items the value is negative (-1)
and thus before this change the checkout availability was reported
incorrectly.
To test:
1) Run prove t/db_dependent/Holds/DisallowHoldIfItemsAvailable.t
Notice it fails
2) Apply this patch
3) Run prove t/db_dependent/Holds/DisallowHoldIfItemsAvailable.t
Notice it passes now.
To test via Koha sandbox (Alternatively):
1) Create circ rule with If all unavailable
2) Create new biblio
3) Order a new item to the biblio via acquisitions and set the not
for loan value to Ordered / -1
4) Notice you cannot place a hold to the biblio
5) Apply patch
6) Notice you can now place a hold to the biblio
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When you edit and save items with an empty "c - Shelving location"
field, it gets stored into the database as "NULL",
which is allowed in the database, and the field is not "required",
so this seems expected.
But when the search page is rendered, it gets value by location key
($shelflocations->{ $item->{location} }) which gives undef warning.
Solved by checking if $item->{location} is perl true.
To reproduce:
1) Edit the book or create new one with an empty shelving location.
2) Use the search feature to have that book in the searched list.
3) Check plack-intranet-error.log to find "Use of uninitialized
value in hash element" error.
4) Apply the patch.
5) Repeat the search and check the logs again to ensure that error
didn't appear again.
Signed-off-by: Didier Gautheron <didier.gautheron@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It seems that we don't really need all this overhead.
YesNo must be a boolean and contain 1 or 0.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This fixes the warning:
Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Reserves.pm line 860.
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
PROCESSED gave the apearance that the item processing had been completed
whereas in reading the code it appears to actually signify that the item
is awaiting/in proessing state.
This patch updates the variable to be PROCESSING consistently throughout
the codebase.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This prevents checking out to a patron an item with hold to someone
else in the In Processing state via staff interface.
Also the checkout error message via SIP is now a more clearer one: "Item is
on hold for another patron." Before it was "Item cannot be issued:
$confirmation".
Also the branch transfer and batch checkout pages are adapted to this new
confirmation message as well.
To test:
1) Create bib level hold to an item for patron A
2) Check-in that item via SIP2, now the hold state should be "In processing"
3) Apply patch
4) Try to checkout the item to patron B via staff interface and
notice we get now confirmation prompt do we really want to do it
because it is in processing.
In order to not have to setup SIP2 server, alternatively steps 1) and
2) can be done so that you check-in the item in staff interface and
make it Waiting, and then with SQL change it to "In processing":
UPDATE reserves SET found = "P" WHERE reserve_id = XXX;
UPDATE reserves SET waitingdate = NULL WHERE reserve_id = XX
UPDATE reserves SET expirationdate = NULL WHERE reserve_id = XXX;
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Because AllowItemsOnHoldCheckoutSIP only affects the checkoutability
of non-attached, i.e. RESERVED holds in SIP2 we can therefore use the
common code from CanBookBeIssued and ignore only the RESERVED confirmation
message case in SIP2 checkout code.
This slightly changes the checkout error message given for "In
processing" holds that someone other than the holdee tries to
checkout. Otherwise there is no logic changes. The message that this
changes is "Item is on hold for another patron." vs. now "Item cannot
be issued: $confirmation". It is easier to create follow-up patch to
properly add INPROCESSING confirmation to CanBookBeIssued and then
show correct message based on the CanBookBeIssued return value.
To test:
1) Apply all patches from bug 25690 to get latest Transaction.t version
2) prove t/db_dependent/SIP/Transaction.t => passes
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Items that are attached to a hold and being transferred (found = T) is
final decision and you cannot checkout those to other patrons.
To test (if you have applied all patches from bug 25690):
1) prove t/db_dependent/SIP/Transaction.t => passes
To test (if you don't have all patches):
1) Create hold and set pickup library to something else where the
item is at
2) Return the item and it should confirm the hold and start transfer
3) Apply this patch
4) Try to checkout this item now to some other patron via SIP2 and
notice it doesn't allow it
5) Revert this patch
6) Notice you can now checkout somebody else's hold that is being transferred!
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The patch "Bug 19116: Hold not set to waiting after transfer" added a
new meaning to 'Reserved' return value of C4::Reserves::CheckReserves
function. Let's remove double usage and have separate Transferred
return value so we can differentiate between attached and non-attached
holds. This will come useful in future refactorings.
This patch does no changes to the logic except in the
/cgi-bin/koha/circ/branchtransfers.pl and circulation.pl we now give
similarly to waiting state notice about hold being transferred.
To test:
1) Apply this patch
2) Create a new item level hold so that pickup library is different
than where the item is currently. Then return the item so that hold
is being attached and transferred.
3) Go to branchtransfers.pl and try to create a new transfer: it
should prompt you with message "Item is attached to a hold and
being transferred for XXX" and provide you with option to cancel
the hold or to ignore the transfer.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We update TransferCollection to use the settled upon standard for
passing error messages back from a method. This patch updates the
corresponding unit test.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
As highlighted, we were not using the standard form of message passing
here. This patch updates the template and controller to adopt the more
usual syntax.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch replaces the use of C4::Circulation::transferbook in
C4::RotatingCollections with calls to Koha::Item->request_transfer and
adds handling for the various failure cases which that can throw.
We also introduce additional feedback for the end user where it did not
exist before. Now we notify the user if some of the collection could not
be transfers or if transfers were queued rather than set to request
immediately.
Test plan
1/ Set up a rotating collection
2/ Transfer the collection
3/ Confirm the action succeeds
4/ Set up some branch transfer limits that will affect items in your
collection
5/ Transfer the collection
6/ Note that the transfer succeeds but some items are returned as
failures
Signed-off-by: Kathleen Milne <kathleen.milne@cne-siar.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
ModeReserveAffect was setting all transfers in the queue to received by
looping through a resultset. This patch updates the logic to try and
catch the in_transit transfer and receive just that one instead.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The SIP initiated transfer was set to use the 'TransferTrigger' passed
back from AddReturn; However, TransferTrigger is not set for reserves in
AddReturn (It's is set controller side by circ/returns.pl). We thus need
to also hard code the trigger type in the SIP transaction for reserves.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
C4::Items::ModItemTransfer is used throughout the codebase and currently
it will never set the daterequested or datecancelled fields. With the
modifications to how circulation deals with transfers we need to update
this function to set those fields appropriately. Functionality has been
retained, ModItemTransfer will continue to add a transfer regardless of
limits or current transits existing.
Signed-off-by: Kathleen Milne <kathleen.milne@cne-siar.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
With the first uses of Koha::Item->request_transfer and
Koha::Item::Transfer->cancel having been added, we need to update
GetTransferFromTo to respect transfers that have been requested but
not yet sent and not cancelled.
Test plan
1/ Run the included unit test
2/ Confirm the "Transfers to recieve" page loads
3/ Signoff
Signed-off-by: Kathleen Milne <kathleen.milne@cne-siar.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Update C4::Circulation::AddReturn to use Koha::Item->get_transfer to
find requested transfers and use Koha::Item::Transfer->receipt to complete
transfer requests if they have arrived at their destination or return the
relevant 'WrongTransfer', 'WasTransfered' and 'TransferTrigger' messages
to the end user.
Signed-off-by: Kathleen Milne <kathleen.milne@cne-siar.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch changes the original implementation so the item object is
refreshed altogether instead of explicitly pinpointing a specific field
we identified an edge case can leave out from ->store. I propose this
alterate implementation because what this bug highlights is the fact we
don't code thinking calls to things can have side-effects (like this
case, with AddReturn updating the onloan status (and maybe other
things?).
To test:
1. Make sure circ tests pass with and without this patch
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If any item is currently checked out to a patron, and the item is then checked out directly to another patron without manually checking the item in first, the items.onloan column will remain NULL.
This will only happen if the new checkout will be due the same day as the previous checked.
This is caused by the item being returned without updating the item object from storage afterward. Even though AddIssue will call AddReturn which sets the value of onloan to NULL in the database, we are not passing in the item object by reference, so it's onloan value remains set to a date. Then we set the onloan value to the same date. Because the value does not change in the object, the column does not get marked dirty.
We could update the object from storage first, but it seems more efficient to mark the column as dirty manually to avoid that otherwise unnecessary fetch.
Test Plan:
1) Apply these patches
2) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisettes@latahlibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Marti Fuerst <mfuerst@hmcpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patchs adds a new SIP option to block checkout of previously
checked-out documents: prevcheckout_block_checkout
See the CheckPrevCheckout system preference to enable previously
checked-out verification in Koha.
Test plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Enable the CheckPrevCheckout syspref (on "Do" for instance)
3) Enable prevcheckout_block_checkout in the SIP server config file
4) Checkout and checkin an item for a user
5) Checkout the item again with the SIP CLI tool
6) Check that the SIP message is "This item was previously checked out by you"
and that the item was not checked out
7) Disable prevcheckout_block_checkout in the SIP server config file
8) Checkout the item again with the SIP CLI tool
9) Check that the SIP message is "This item was previously checked out by you"
and that the item was checked out.
10) Prove t/db_dependent/SIP/Message.t
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It was tricky to write the previous patch so I decided to clean the
ground (a bit) for later, taking advantage of having people who are
going to test the whole area.
We can move it to its own bug report if QA wants to.
Sponsored-by: Orex Digital
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Sponsored-by: Orex Digital
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Same patch for the authority frameworks/records
Sponsored-by: Orex Digital
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This new enhancement adds the ability to change the default order the subfields.
Both bibliographic and authority MARC subfield structure are taken into
account. And so the item edition as well (in the different screens when
item can be added/edited).
This will answer the following needs that have been listed in the
comments of the bug report:
- $i in 7xx fields should be the first subfield in the sequence
- 300 fields are sorted number first when cataloguers enter the letter fields first
- 100 field, it's commonly $a, $q, $d.
Test plan:
1. Edit a MARC frameworks, field 300
2. Resort the subfield (drag and drop the tab of the subfield) as you
like
3. Save
=> Notice that the list of fields are displayed following the order you
chose
4. Edit it again
=> The order is correctly kept!
5. Create a new bibliographic record
6. Notice that the subfields are order in the same sequence
7. Fill different subfields, not all
8. Save, edit again
9. Note that the subfields that have been filled are listed first, then
the empty ones. But the sequence defined at the framework level is kept.
10. Do the same for an authority framework and create/edit an authority
record
11. Modify item (952) subfields order
12. Create an item and confirm that the order is correct
13. Modify the ACQ framework, 952, modify the order of the subfield
14. Create a new order and confirm that the item form has the subfield
ordered following the sequence defined at the framework level
QA: Note that this patch is about bibliographic records only, next
patches deal with authotiries and items.
Sponsored-by: Orex Digital
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We should remove all SQL queries that contain 0000-00-00 and finally
assume we do not longer have such value in our DB (for date type)
We already dealt with such values in previous update DB entries.
The 2 added by this one haven't been replaced already.
The code will now assume that either a valid date exist, or NULL/undef.
Test plan:
QA review is needed and test of the different places where code is
modified.
Not sure about the change from reports/issues_avg_stats.pl
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The deadlock reports tell us that multiple transactions are
waiting for a X lock on a record but using a secondary index
on borrowernumber and itemnumber. Since we have the issue_id
at hand already, we should use that and benefit from the clustered
index (on PK) instead of using a secondary index.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
While this won't prevent the deadlock, it should catch the case where
a deadlock causes the DB update to fail and provide feedback to the user
and rollback the transaction
I don't know how to trigger the deadlock, I can only confirm that we see it, and
that this should catch it.
To test:
1 - Apply patches
2 - Checkout several items to a patron
3 - Confirm that 'Renew all' feature continues to work as expected and all items are renewed
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The sanitization using regex and \w class of characters might be
enough but given the vast number of unicode characters in \w and
possibility of in the future the database engines interpreting some of
those characters with special meaning it is better to wrap the column
identifier to quotes using $dbh->quote_identifier so it is only
interpreted as identifier and nothing else.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We are not on the safe side when we build the ORDER BY clause from the
DataTables parameters.
I've started to limit the columns by using Koha::Objects->columns, but
for instance for the patron search we need (at least) the columns from
the branches, categories and members tables.
It seems easier, and still safe, to use a regex.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
A few lines of code were added to CheckReserves containing the wrong
use of two perl functions: grep and split on bug 25232.
A test was added even making these things pass.
Test plan:
Run t/db../Holds.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Caused by bug 23403 - when performing a checkin we lookup the SIP patron
using the borrowernumber, however, SIP only knows how to find a patron
via cardnumber or userid
The change on 23403 was to avoid using an 'id' that didn't always exist
(as some users don't have a userid or cardnumber
When checking in, however, we are not passed a user cardnumber or
borrowernumber, so we don't have those on hand to get the patron.
Test Plan:
1) Check in an item via SIP, note patron is not found
2) Apply this patch
3) Restart all the things!
4) Check in an item via SIP, patron should be found!
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Amended: POD line for $import_record_id.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To prevent conflict with Encode::encode
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There is a difference between YAML::Load and YAML::XS::Load
From YAML::XS pod:
"YAML::XS only deals with streams of utf8 octets"
Test plan:
We are going to test 1 occurence and QA will confirm others don't
contain typos.
0. Don't apply the patches
1. Create a new itemtype with code=❤️
2. Create a new item using this itemtype (to biblionumber=1 will work)
3. Fill OpacHiddenItems with
itype: [❤️]
4. Search for "street shuffle" or any terms that will return the biblio
Notice that the item is there (there is an error in logs)
5. Apply the patches
6. Repeat 4 and confirm that the item is now hidden
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
From tht YAML pod:
"""
This module has been released to CPAN as YAML::Old, and soon YAML.pm will be changed to just be a frontend interface module for all the various Perl YAML implementation modules, including YAML::Old.
If you want robust and fast YAML processing using the normal Dump/Load API, please consider switching to YAML::XS. It is by far the best Perl module for YAML at this time. It requires that you have a C compiler, since it is written in C.
"""
See also
https://gitlab.com/koha-community/qa-test-tools/-/merge_requests/35
Test plan:
Try some place where YAML::XS is not used and confirm that it works
correctly
QA note: This patch removes some uses of YAML that were not useful
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Since bug 26639 we have auto savepoint enabled and the LOCK TABLE query
in C4::Circulation::SendCirculationAlert is not correctly handled.
From the MySQL doc that is copied few lines before, "LOCK TABLE will
commit any transactions", but here we don't have a savepoint and the
release for a non-existent savepoint will throw a DBI exception.
This patch removes the unecessary transaction and prevent the following
error when a renewal is done:
> DBIx::Class::Storage::DBI::mysql::_exec_svp_release(): DBI Exception: DBD::mysql::db do failed: SAVEPOINT savepoint_0 does not exist [for Statement "RELEASE SAVEPOINT savepoint_0"] at /usr/share/koha/lib/C4/Circulation.pm line 3590
Test plan:
1. Enable RenewalSendNotice
2. Add some email address to patron and select the email box from the message preference "Item checkout and renewal" in order to receive renewal emails.
3. Check 1 item out to a patron
4. Renew it
Signed-off-by: Andrew Nugged <nugged@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If a cell contains an empty string it was not taken into account.
Test plan:
Same as CSV but with ODS
Signed-off-by: Ron Houk <rhouk@ottumwapubliclibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The CSV import of the biblio frameworks is broken.
A change in LibreOffice resulted in CSV not formatted how the
C4::ImportExportFramework code is expected.
This code is quite broken, it expects all the CSV cells to be quoted.
The "add tests" patch shows the different between what we expected
before this patch, and what is the new version generated by LibreOffice.
Test plan:
Export a biblio framework in CSV
Open it with LibreOffice and save it undef a different name
Create a new biblio framework and use the new file to construct it
Compare the 2 frameworks and make sure they are identical
Signed-off-by: Ron Houk <rhouk@ottumwapubliclibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
