The change in batchMod.pl is not needed when we fix the builder.
But we could at least add a comment there!
Note that passing the biblionumber of the first item does not
make sense since we are modifying items from several biblio
records normally. We most probably do not want this MARC
record's itemcallnumber (via the syspref) in all our items.
Test plan:
Test batchMod with and without the Populate fields checkbox.
Fill syspref 'itemcallnumber' with e.g. 084a.
Check Populate, and try again.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
When one tries to batch mod items and has "Use default values"
checkbox checked on and they have value in syspref "itemcallnumber",
Koha dies on error 500. In logs it reads:
Can't call method "field" on an undefined value at
.../Koha/Koha/UI/Form/Builder/Item.pm line 164.
This happens because in batchMod.pl line 269 we don't pass
biblionumber as parameter to Koha::UI::Form::Builder::Item->new
and thus Koha fails to fetch biblios marc record.
To test:
1. Confirm you have/set value to syspref "itemcallnumber" e.g. 084a
2. Find some item(s) to modify
3. Provide barcodes of those item(s) and check checkbox "Use default values"
4. Hit "Continue"
=> error 500 is raised
5. Apply patch.
6. Repeat steps 3. and 4.
=> no error is raised
Sponsored-by: Koha-Suomi Oy
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The idea rely on the KohaDates TT plugin for the date formatting. We
should not have any output_pref calls in pl or pm (there are some
exceptions, for ILSDI for instance).
Also flatpickr will deal with the places where dates are inputed. We
will pass the raw SQL value (what we call 'iso' in Koha::DateUtils), and
the controller will receive the same value, no need to additional
conversion.
Note that DBIC has the capability to auto-deflate DateTime objects,
which makes things way easier. We can either pass the value we receive
from the controller, or pass a DT object to our methods.
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The object search is currently:
Koha::Items->search({ barcode => \@contentlist }
Which generate code like:
barcode = 1 OR barcode = 2 OR barcode = 3 ....
This can get quite large
We can reduce the query size by using -in:
Koha::Items->search({ barcode => { -in => \@contentlist } }
Which generates code like:
barcode in ( 1, 2, 3 )
To test:
1 - Apply patch
2 - Perform batch modifications
3 - Confirm nothing has changed
Signed-off-by: Rachael Laritz <rachael.laritz@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch modifies instances in the code which try to get cookies
using:
my %cookies = parse CGI::Cookie($cookie);
In some cases the relevant lines can be removed because they are unused.
In others it can be replaced with:
my %cookies = CGI::Cookie->fetch();
To test, apply the patch and restart_all. Test the following pages to
confirm they load without errors:
- Circulation -> Offline circulation file upload
- Circulation -> Offline circulation -> Add to queue
- Tools -> Batch item modification
- Tools -> Stage MARC for import
- Tools -> Staged MARC management
- Tools -> Batch patron modification
- Tools -> Upload local cover image
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
The value of the checkbox was not correct
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Here we go!
Disclaimer: this patch is huge and does many things, but splitting it in
several chunks would be time consuming and painful to rebase. However it
adds many tests and isolate/refactor code to make it way more reusable.
This patchset will make the "batch item modification" and "batch item
deletion" features use the task queue (reminder: Since bug 28158, and so
21.05.00, we do no longer use the old "background job" functionality and
the user does not get any info about the progress of the job).
More than that, more of the code to build an item form and a list of
items is now isolated in module (.pm) and include files (.inc)
We are reusing the changes made by bug 27526 that simplifies the way we
edit/create items (no more unecessary serialization Koha > MARC > MARCXML
> XML > HTML)
New module:
* Koha::BackgroundJob::BatchDeleteItem
Subclass for process item deletion in batch
* Koha::BackgroundJob::BatchUpdateItem
Subclass for process item modification in batch
* Koha::Item::Attributes
We needed an object to represent item's attributes that are not
mapped with a koha field (aka "more subfields xml")
This module will help us to create the marcxml from a hashref and the
reverse.
* Koha::UI::Form::Builder::Item
The code that was used to build the add/edit item form is
centralised in this module. In conjunction with the
subfields_for_item BLOCK (from html_helpers.inc) it will be really
easy to reuse this code in other places where the item form is used
(acquisition and serials modules)
* Koha::UI::Table::Builder::Items
Same as previously for the table. We are now using this table from 3
different places (batch item mod, batch item del, backgroung job
detail view) and the code is only in one place.
To use with items_table_batchmod BLOCK (still from html_helpers.inc)
This patch is fixing some bugs about repeatable subfields and regex. A UI
change will reflect the limitation: if you want to apply a regex on a
subfield you cannot add several subfields for the same subfield code.
Test plan:
Prepare the ground:
- Make sure you are always using a bibliographic/item record using the framework
you are modifying!
- Add some subfields for items that are not mapped with a koha field
(note that you can use 'é' for more fun, don't try more funny
characters)
- Make some subfields (mapped and not mapped with a kohafield)
repeatable
- Add default values to some of your subfields
There are 4 main screens to test:
1. Add/edit item form
The behaviour should be the same before and after this patch.
See test plan from bug 27526.
Those 2 prefs must be tested:
* SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedEditing
* SubfieldsToUseWhenPrefill
2. Batch modification
a. Fill some values, play with repeatable and regex.
Note that the behaviour in master was buggy, only the first value was modified by the regex:
* With subfield = "a | b"
1 value added with "new"
=> "new | b"
* With subfield = "a | b"
2 new fields "new1","new2"
=> "new2 | b"
Important note: For repeatable subfields, a regex will apply on the subfields in
the "concatenated form". To apply the regex on all the different subfields of a given
subfield code you must use the "g" modifier.
This could be improved later, but keep in mind that it's not a regression or behaviour
change.
b. Play with the "Populate fields with default values from default framework" checkbox
c. Use this tool to modify items and play with the different sysprefs that
interfer with it:
* NewItemsDefaultLocation
* SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedBatchmod
* MaxItemsToDisplayForBatchMod
* MaxItemsToProcessForBatchMod
3. Batch deletion
a. Batch delete some items
b. Check items out and try to delete them
c. Use the "Delete records if no items remain" checkbox to delete
bibliographic records without remaining items.
d. Play with the following sysprefs and confirm that it works as
expected:
* MaxItemsToDisplayForBatchDel
e. Stress the tool: Go to the confirmation screen with items that can be
deleted, don't request the job to be processed right away, but check the
item out before.
4. Background job detail view
You must have seen it already if you are curious and tested the above.
When a new modification or deletion batch is requested, the confirmation
screen will tell you that the job has enqueued. A link to the progress
of the job can be followed.
On this screen you will be able to see the result of the job once it's
fully processed.
QA notes:
* There are some FIXME's that are not blocker in my opinion. Feel free to
discuss them if you have suggestions.
* Do we still need MaxItemsToProcessForBatchMod?
* Prior to this patchset we had a "Return to the cataloging module" link
if we went from the cataloguing module and that the biblio was deleted.
We cannot longer know if the biblio will be deleted but we could display
a "Go to the cataloging module" link on the "job has been enqueued"
screen regardless from where we were coming from.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Now that it's reusable, let use it somewhere else!
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There is a "tabloop" variable that is passed from the add item form logic to the cataloguing plugins.
But there is confusion, sometimes it's an iterator ($i) and sometimes (batchMod.pl) an array.
Actually this tabloop variable is never used from cataloguing plugins, we should remove it.
Test plan:
Read the code and confirm the above.
You can also test a couple of plugins and confirm that they are still
working.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The indicator value for 952 was hard coded in every case to " ". In
order to achieve that we can simply pass undef to TransformHtmlToXml()
and it will set the indicator values to " ".
To test:
1) Make sure the submission of (at least some) the modified files
still work, e.g. test that making a new item via
cataloguing/additem.pl works.
Signed-off-by: Petro Vashchuk <stalkernoid@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Rebased-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Some of our partners have unusual barcode requirements that have
required us to transform scanned barcodes using javascript. This is not
the most reliable method. It would make more sense to have Koha
transform the barcodes on the backend using a plugin. We should add
hooks to transform and generate new item and patron barcodes.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Download and install the Barcode Transformer plugin
https://github.com/bywatersolutions/koha-plugin-barcode-transformer/releases/
3) Go to the plugin configuration page, set the configuration to the example configuration from the same page
4) In the item barcode field on the checkin and checkout pages,
and anywhere else you can scan an item barcode, type in some
valid barcodes, but prefix them with X and postfix them with
Y, e.g. X123456Y
5) Note the letters are removed by Koha!
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 26351: (QA follow-up) Fix QA script issue
* Fixes issue with barcode generate stub so perlcritic is happy
* Removes extra semicolon from return call in configure method
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 26351: Add unit tests
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 26351: (QA follow-up) Remove unused method barcode_transform
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 26351: (QA follow-up) Rename barcode_transform to item_barcode_transform
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 26351: (QA follow-up) Barcodes inputted into Koha should always pass though barcodedecode
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 26351: (QA follow-up) Catch one last case of itemBarcodeInputFilter
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 26351: (QA follow-up) Fix Checkouts.t
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 26351: Use call_recursive() as a replacement for call()
The method `call()` is not sufficient for barcode transformations. It's
possible that more than one barcode transformation plugin will be
installed. The `call_recursive()` method takes the output of the first
plugin and uses it as the input for the next plugin and so on. This allowes
each plugin to see the current version of the barcode and modify it if
necessary.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 26351: Fix t/db_dependent/Koha/Plugins/Circulation_hooks.t
Bug 26351: Revert improper change to unit test, fix number of tests
Bug 26351: Remove uneeded use Koha::Plugins statements
Left over from previous changes
Bug 26351: Add missing barcodedecode import
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It has never been used and should be removed
Test plan:
Search for "find_value" in the file and confirm that there is no more
occurrence
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Caused by bug 28158, the batch item modifications tool does not longer
display the table with the items that have been modified on the result screen.
There is no more fork and so no more completedJobID var.
We must process the items THEN build the items' info.
Test plan:
Use the batch item modification tools to modify some items.
Confirm that with this patch the table with the modified items is
displayed on the last screen.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Undefined subroutine &CGI::Compile::ROOT::kohadevbox_koha_tools_batchMod_2epl::haspermission called at /kohadevbox/koha/tools/batchMod.pl line 89
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
On bug 17591 we discovered that there was something weird going on with
the way we export and use subroutines/modules.
This patch tries to standardize our EXPORT to use EXPORT_OK only.
That way we will need to explicitely define the subroutine we want to
use from a module.
This patch is a squashed version of:
Bug 17600: After export.pl
Bug 17600: After perlimport
Bug 17600: Manual changes
Bug 17600: Other manual changes after second perlimports run
Bug 17600: Fix tests
And a lot of other manual changes.
export.pl is a dirty script that can be found on bug 17600.
"perlimport" is:
git clone https://github.com/oalders/App-perlimports.git
cd App-perlimports/
cpanm --installdeps .
export PERL5LIB="$PERL5LIB:/kohadevbox/koha/App-perlimports/lib"
find . \( -name "*.pl" -o -name "*.pm" \) -exec perl App-perlimports/script/perlimports --inplace-edit --no-preserve-unused --filename {} \;
The ideas of this patch are to:
* use EXPORT_OK instead of EXPORT
* perltidy the EXPORT_OK list
* remove '&' before the subroutine names
* remove some uneeded use statements
* explicitely import the subroutines we need within the controllers or
modules
Note that the private subroutines (starting with _) should not be
exported (and not used from outside of the module except from tests).
EXPORT vs EXPORT_OK (from
https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2010/06/perl-exporter-examples/)
"""
Export allows to export the functions and variables of modules to user’s namespace using the standard import method. This way, we don’t need to create the objects for the modules to access it’s members.
@EXPORT and @EXPORT_OK are the two main variables used during export operation.
@EXPORT contains list of symbols (subroutines and variables) of the module to be exported into the caller namespace.
@EXPORT_OK does export of symbols on demand basis.
"""
If this patch caused a conflict with a patch you wrote prior to its
push:
* Make sure you are not reintroducing a "use" statement that has been
removed
* "$subroutine" is not exported by the C4::$MODULE module
means that you need to add the subroutine to the @EXPORT_OK list
* Bareword "$subroutine" not allowed while "strict subs"
means that you didn't imported the subroutine from the module:
- use $MODULE qw( $subroutine list );
You can also use the fully qualified namespace: C4::$MODULE::$subroutine
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We are using Koha::Logger when it makes sense to keep the info,
otherwise we simply remove it
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Bug 28572: Replace missing occurrence in misc/admin/koha-preferences
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We used to display a list of items that cannot be deleted (checked out
or on hold) on the Batch item deletion tool.
With bug 8132 we improve the error handling, but the info is spread in
the table.
This patch adds, at the top of the page, the list of items (barcode)
that cannot be removed.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
== Test plan ==
1 - In the default framework make sure the 952$1 is visible in opac & catalog & editor
2 - Set WhenLostChargeReplacementFee to charge
3 - Set MarkLostitemsAsReturned to return from batch modification
4 - Find/edit an item with a replacement cost
5 - Check out the item to a patron
6 - Batch modify the item
7 - Set the lost status
8 - Item is not returned or charged
9 - with the patch, it is
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch is the result of making the same changes we did on the
t/db_dependent/AuthorisedValues.t file (replacing the calls to
Koha::AuthorisedValues->search with the tricky branchcode param, and
call ->search_with_library_limits, with the library_id as a third
parameter.
What I did was:
$ git grep 'Koha::AuthorisedValues\->search'
and then revisited each of the grep results to check if they added the
'branchcode' parameter to the filters.
This patch changes the calls to ->search, for
->search_with_library_limits in all the places that require it in the
current codebase [1].
To test:
1. Apply this patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Charges/Sales.t \
t/db_dependent/Ill*
3. Verify the batchmod.pl script is working and filtering the authorised
values keeps working
[1] Some places like the Koha/Template/Plugin/AuthorisedValues.pm plugin
don't seem to be tested, at first glance.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In the code we prepare items for display if less than or equal to the pref, but we don't allow
the edit if greater than or equal to the pref. The second case should be only 'greater than'
To test:
1- Set MaxItemsToProcessForBatchMod to 1000
2- Go to Reports
3- Make a report for itemnumbers that will give you at least 1000 items (ex. SELECT itemnumber FROM items)
4- Save and run the report
5- In "Rows per page", choose 1000
6- Click on "Batch operations with 1000 visible records" > Batch item modification
7- Notice that the item modification form isn't there and that the message says "Too many items (1000): You are not allowed to edit more than 1000 items in a batch."
8- Apply patch
9- Restart all the things
10- Run the report again and display 1000 rows
11- Click on "Batch operations with 1000 visible records" > Batch item modification
12 - Sucess!
Signed-off-by: Barbara Johnson <barbara.johnson@bedfordtx.gov>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It looks like the field was intentionally removed from the list
of batch editable fields in the past. This makes sense as we
used to have a unique index on it at some point - but we do have
no more.
This removes the exception so that the invendory number behaves
like the other fields on the batch item edit form.
To test:
- Create some items with and without stocknumber
- Go to tools > batch item modification
- Enter the barcodes of your selected items in the list or
upload a file with them
- Verify that the stocknumber/inventory number is not showing
in the item edit form below
- Apply patch
- Reload the page - inventory number is there now
- Batch edit the inventory number and verify it works as expected
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When batch editing, 2 reindex calls are sent to ES/Zebra.
We can easily avoid that reusing the skip_modzebra_update (renamed skip_record_index)
Additionally we should only send one request for biblio, and we should
only do it if we succeed
As the whole batch mod is in a transaction it is possible to fail in which case
Zebra queue is reset, but ES indexes have already been set
In addition to the skip param this patchset moves Zebra and Elasticsearch calls to
Indexer modules and introduces a generic Koha::SearchEngine::Indexer so that we don't
need to check the engine when calling for index
The new index_records routine takes an array so that we can reduce the calls to
the ES server.
The index_records routine for Zebra loops over ModZebra to avoid affecting current behaviour
Test plan:
General tests, under both search engines:
1 - Add a biblio and confirm it is searchable
2 - Edit the biblio and confirm changes are searchable
3 - Add an item, confirm it is searchable
4 - Delete an item, confirm it is not searchable
5 - Delete a biblio, confirm it is not searchable
6 - Add an authority and confirm it is searchable
7 - Delete an authority and confirm it is not searchable
Batch mod tests, under both search engines
1 - Have a bib with several items, none marked 'not for loan'
2 - Do a staff search that returns this biblio
3 - Items show as available
4 - Click on title to go to details page
5 - Edit->Item in a batch
6 - Set the not for loan status for all items
7 - Repeat your search
8 - Items show as not for loan
9 - Test batch deleting items
a - Test with a list of items, not deleting bibs
b - Test with a list of items, deleting bibs if no items remain where all items are only item on a biblio:
SELECT MAX(barcode) FROM items GROUP BY biblionumber HAVING COUNT(barcode) IN (1)
c - Test with a list of items, deleting bibs if no items remain where some items are the only item on a biblio:
SELECT MAX(barcode) FROM items GROUP BY biblionumber HAVING COUNT(barcode) IN (1,2)
10 - Confirm records are update/deleted as appropriate
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It defaults to 0 in get_template_and_user
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
em is better for accessibility
We should set the field to 0 when it was previously unset
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
JD amended patch: remove unecessary indentation changes
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds the ability to exclude patrons (by category) from local
holds, and items, by editing the item itself or by batch item
modification tool.
To test:
1. apply patches
2. updatedatabase
3. Enable LocalHoldsPriority preference, and leave
LocalHoldsPriorityPatronControl in pickup library, and
LocalHoldsPriorityItemControl in holding library.
4. Search for a biblio with one item.
5. Place a hold with a patron (patron1) and set pickup location to a different
library of the item's home library
6. Place another hold with another patron (patron2) and set pickup location to be
the same as the item's home library
7. ./misc/cronjobs/holds/build_holds_queue.pl
8. Go to circulation -> holds queue
9. Search by the item's home library
CHECK => only the hold for patron2 (with the pickup location the same as the
item's home library) appears in the table
10. Go back to the biblio details page and click on "Items" tab
CHECK => There is a new section in the item's details between "Statuses"
and "History" called "Priority"
11. Set exclude to "Yes" and update
12. repeat steps 7 to 9
SUCCESS => only the hold for patron1 now appears, even the other hold had local
hold priority
13. Repeat step 10 and 11 but this time set exclude to "No"
14. repeat steps 7 to 9
CHECK => the hold for patron2 is back
15. Edit patron2's category and set exclude from local holds priority to
"Yes"
16. Repeat steps 7 to 9
SUCCESS => the hold for patron1 is back
17. Go to tools -> Batch item modification and in barcode list place
several (existing) barcodes and press continue
CHECK => There is a new section in the bottom called "Priority"
18. Set exclude to "Yes" and save
SUCCESS => all items in the list now have exclude setted to "Yes"
19. Try to checkout the first item to a patron3
SUCCESS => Alert message appears saying that patron1 has a hold on that
item
20. Click on Yes and then checkin that item
SUCCESS => There is a modal window saying that a hold was found for
patron1
21. prove t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t t/db_dependent/Holds/LocalHoldsPriority.t
22. Sign off
Sponsored-by: Cooperative Information Network (CIN)
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
0 - Perform a search in the staff client
1 - Click a title to go to the details page for a record
2 - Click the 'Edit' button and select 'Edit items in a batch'
3 - Note the searchid is in the url
4 - Make a change and hit 'Save'
5 - Note the 'Return the the record' link at the top, and the button on the bottom include searchid in URL
6 - Click one and note the brwoser is stil there
7 - Click 'Edit' and select 'Delete items in a batch'
8 - Delete one item
9 - Click return to record
10 - Browser is there
11 - Click 'Delete items in a batch again
12 - Select all and check 'Delete records if no items remain'
13 - Delete them
14 - Note you have a link to 'Go back to the results'
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch removes some new error cases introduced during rebase
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds a .perlcriticrc (copied from qa-test-tools) and fixes
almost all perlcrictic violations according to this .perlcriticrc
The remaining violations are silenced out by appending a '## no critic'
to the offending lines. They can still be seen by using the --force
option of perlcritic
This patch also modify t/00-testcritic.t to check all Perl files using
the new .perlcriticrc.
I'm not sure if this test script is still useful as it is now equivalent
to `perlcritic --quiet .` and it looks like it is much slower
(approximatively 5 times slower on my machine)
Test plan:
1. Run `perlcritic --quiet .` from the root directory. It should output
nothing
2. Run `perlcritic --quiet --force .`. It should output 7 errors (6
StringyEval, 1 BarewordFileHandles)
3. Run `TEST_QA=1 prove t/00-testcritic.t`
4. Read the patch. Check that all changes make sense and do not
introduce undesired behaviour
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The last_item_for_hold case cannot be guessed (easily), and so we are going to
delete the items in a transaction. If something wrong happened we
rollback and display a list of items that caused the rollback.
Signed-off-by: Kelly McElligott <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
When the list of items is displayed we already know if there will be a
problem during the deletion. So let's disable the checkbox to tell the
user in advance that items cannot be deleted.
Signed-off-by: Kelly McElligott <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test plan:
Go to Home › Tools › Batch item modification
Insert barcodes and continue
=> Without this patch you will get warning in the log
=> With this patch applied you warning does no longer appear
Confirm that the number of holds is correct
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
- Find/create a bib with at least one item
- From detail.pl, use the checkboxes in the holdings table to select one or more items
- click the "Modify Selected Items" link just above the holdings table to take your item(s) to batch modification
- Change something and click save
- Observe that the Return to the Record link points to a url without a biblionumber: "/cgi-bin/koha/catalogue/detail.pl?biblionumber="
- Apply patch
- Repeat
- The link now works!
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Bug 24423: Fix for deletion - cleanup accidental debug inclusiopm
To test:
Repeat prior test plan with 'Delete selected'
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test plan:
- go to Tools > Batch item modification,
- select items to modify,
- for one or some text fields, check the second checkbox (Use regular
expression) and type your regex,
- check the regex has been applied.
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Marc Thibault <pierre-marc.thibault@inLibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathilde Formery <mathilde.formery@ville-nimes.fr>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
The lines with my @barcodes makes no sense anymore.
Test plan:
Test with a barcode file.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
The solution for items does not work, since it compares barcodes.
Instead of a grep in a map, we could do simpler.
Test plan:
Try barcode file, order not by itemnumber. Toggle with case. Add wrong code.
Try same via barcode list text area.
Try an itemnumber file, reorder again. Add wrong number.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
They must be displayed in the same order they have been scanned (or they
appear in the file)
This is an alternative patch. Same behavior for barcodes or itemnumbers,
as well as if a file has been used or items scanned.
Code is duplicated, but refactoring is out of the scope.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
If a bibliographic record is deleted after having deleted all their items in a batch,
we should not display a "return to the record" button but "return to cataloguing" instead
Test plan:
1 - Have/make a bib with items
2 - On details page select Edit->Delete items in a batch
3 - Select all items and check "Delete record if no items remain"
4 - Delete the things
5 - On confirmation screen you have a count of items/bibs deleted
=> Without the patch there is a 'Return to record' button that leads to nowhere
=> With this patch there is a "Return to cataloging module" button
6 - Repeat using the "Delete selected items" link on top of the items table
=> Without the patch there is a 'Return to where you were' button that leads to nowhere
=> With this patch there is a "Return to cataloging module" button
Note that there is a link AND a button, coming from
commit 928c0af2b6
Bug 15824 - 'Done' button is unclear on batch item modification and deletion
I do not think it makes sense to have both.
Signed-off-by: George Williams <george@nekls.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch makes batchMod.pl and inventory.pl pick the barcode
separators from a new pref BarcodeSeparators (instead of hardcoding
these separators differently).
A few other code locations may be potential candidates for such a change
too.
Test plan:
Test inventory with a few variations of BarcodeSeparators.
Test Batch item modification similarly.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
